**ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND UNITS OF MEASUREMENT**

In order to see how the minimal
quantum extent and content of our smallest possible elementary distinction
relates to known elementary particles, we develop equations that can be used to
describe the combination of up- and down-quarks to form the proton and neutron
of the Hydrogen atom. We choose the Hydrogen atom to start with because it is
the simplest, most stable, and most abundant known element in the universe. If
all forms of substance are quantized, then in order for quarks to combine in stable
structures, they must satisfy the Diophantine (integer) forms of the equations
of Dimensional Extrapolation conveying the logic of the transfinite substrate
into the space-time domain of our experience. This family of Diophantine
equations is represented mathematically by the expression

**Σ**.

^{n}_{i=1}(X_{n})^{m}= Z^{m}
The Pythagorean Theorem equation, the Fermat’s Last
Theorem equation and other important equations are contained within this general
expression. We mention this fact here because these theorems play key roles in
the geometry and mathematics of Dimensional Extrapolation and the combination
of elementary particles to form stable physical structures. Because the various
forms of this expression as

**m**varies from 3 to 9 conveys the geometry of 9-dimensional reality to our observational domain of 3S-1t, we call this expression the “Conveyance Expression”, and individual equations of the expression ”Conveyance Equations”.
When

**n = m**= 2, the expression yields the equation**(X**

_{1})^{2}+ (X_{2})^{2 }= Z^{2}
which, when related to areas,
describes the addition of two square areas, A

_{1 }and A_{2}with sides equal to X_{1 }and X_{2 }respectively, to form a third area, A_{3}, with sides equal to Z. When these squares are arranged in a plane with two corners of each square coinciding with corners of the other squares to form a right triangle, as shown below, we have a geometric representation of the familiar Pythagorean Theorem demonstrating that the sum of the squares of the sides of any right triangle is equal to the square of the third side (the hypotenuse) of that triangle.**The Pythagorean Theorem**

(

**AB**)^{2}+ (**BC**)^{2}= (**AC**)^{2}
We use this simple equation in Dimensional Extrapolation to define the rotation and orthogonal
projection from one dimensional domain into another, in the plane of the
projection. There are an infinite number of solutions for this equation, one
for every conceivable right triangle, but in a quantized reality, we are only
concerned with the integer solutions. Considering the Pythagorean equation as a
Diophantine equation, we find that there exists an infinite sub-set of
solutions with AB = X

_{1},_{ }BC = X_{2 }and AC = Z equal to integers. Members of this subset, e.g. (3,4,5), (5,12,13), (8,15,17), etc. i.e., (3^{2}+ 4^{2}= 5^{2}, . 5^{2}+ 12^{2}= 13^{2}, 8^{2}+ 15^{2}= 17^{2}, … ) are called “Pythagorean triplets”.
When

**n = 2**and**m = 3**, the expression becomes the equation**(X**.

_{1})^{3}+ (X_{2})^{3 }= Z^{3}
When we define

**X**,_{1}**X**and_{2}**Z**as measures of volumes, just as we defined them as measures of areas when**n = m =**2, we can apply this equation to quantal volumes in a three-dimensional domain. Using the minimal quantal volume as the unit of measurement, and setting it equal to one, we have a Diophantine equation related to our hypothetical elementary particle with minimal spinning volume containing uniform substance: if it is spherical, we can set its radius equal to**r**, and if there is a second uniform spinning particle rotating at maximum velocity, with radius_{1}**r**, we can describe the combination of the two particles by the expression_{2}**4/3π(r**. If this combination produces a third spinning spherical object we have:_{1})^{3}+ 4/3π(r_{2})^{3}**4/3π(r**,

_{1})^{3}+ 4/3π(r_{2})^{3}= 4/3π(r_{3})^{3}
where

**r**is the radius of the new particle. Dividing through by_{3}**4/3π**, we have:**(r**, which is a Diophantine equation of the form of the Fermat equation,

_{1})^{3}+ (r_{2})^{3}= (r_{3})^{3}**X**when

^{m}+ Y^{m}= Z^{m}**m =**3.

Notice that the factor,

**4/3π**cancels out, indicating that this equation is obtained regardless of the shape of the particles, as long as the shape and substance is the same for all three particles. (This is an important fact because we found in investigating the Cabibbo angle that the electron, while symmetrical, is not necessarily spherical.) Note also, that the maximum rotational velocity and angular momentum will be different for particles with different radii, because the inertial mass of each particle will depend upon its total volume. In a quantized reality, the radii must be integer multiples of the minimum quantum length. Since this equation is of the same form as Fermat’s equation,**Fermat’s Last Theorem**tells us that if**r**and_{1}**r**are integers,_{2}**r**cannot be an integer. This means that the right-hand side of this equation, representing the combination of two quantum particles, cannot be a symmetric quantum particle. But, because Planck’s principle of quantized energy and mass tells us that no particle can contain fractions of mass and/or energy units, the right-hand side of the equation represents an unstable asymmetric spinning particle. The combined high-velocity angular momentum of the new particle will cause it to spiral wildly and fly apart. This may lead us to wonder how it is that there are stable particles in the universe, and why there is any physical universe at all. Again, we are faced with Leibniz’s most important question:_{3}*why is there something instead of nothing*?
The answer turns out to be relatively simple, but
is hidden from us by the limitations of our methods of thinking and observation
if we allow them to be wholly dependent upon our physical sense organs. For
example, we think of a sphere as the most perfect symmetrical object; but this
is an illusion. Spherical objects can exist in a Newton-Leibniz world, but we actually
exist in a Planck-Einstein world. In the real world, revealed by Planck and
Einstein, the most perfectly spherical object in three dimensions is a regular
polyhedron. (

*polyhedron = multi-sided three-dimensional form; regular; all sides are of equal length*.) The most easily visualized is the six-sided regular polyhedron, the cube. In the Newton-Leibniz world, the number of sides of a regular polynomial could increase indefinitely. If we imagine the number of sides increasing without limit while the total volume approaches a finite limit, the object appears to become a sphere. But in the quantized world of Planck and Einstein, the number of sides possible is limited, because of the finite size of the smallest possible unit of measurement (which we are defining here) is relative to the size of the object. And because the “shape” factor cancels in the Conveyance Equation for n = 3, Fermat’s Last Theorem tells us that, regardless of the number of sides, no two regular polyhedrons composed of unitary quantum volumes can combine to form a third regular polyhedron composed of unitary quantum volumes.
To help understand the physical implications of this,
suppose our true quantum unit exists in the shape of a cube. Using it as a
literal building block, we can maintain particle symmetry by constructing
larger cubes, combining our basic building blocks as follows: a cube with two
blocks on each side contains 8 blocks; a cube with three blocks on each side
contains 27 blocks; a cube with four blocks on each side contains 64 blocks;
etc. Fermat’s Last Theorem tells us that if we stack the blocks of any two such
symmetric forms together, attempting to keep the number of blocks on all sides
the same, the resulting stack of blocks will always be at least one block
short, or one or more blocks over the number needed to form a perfect cube.
Recall that if these blocks are elementary particles, they are spinning with
very high rates of

*angular**velocity*, and the*spinning*object resulting from combining two symmetric objects composed of unitary quantum volumes will be asymmetric, causing its increasing angular momentum to throw off any extra blocks until it reaches a stable, symmetrically spinning form.
This requirement of symmetry for physical stability
creates the intrinsic dimensionometric structure of reality that is reflected
in the Conveyance Expression. It turns out that there

*be stable structures, because when*__can__**n = m =**3, the Conveyance Expression yields the equation:**(X**,

_{1})^{3}+ (X_{2})^{3 }+ (X_{3})^{3}= Z^{3}

which

**does**have**integer solutions. The first one (with the smallest integer values) is:****3**

^{3}+ 4^{3 }+ 5^{3}= 6^{3}
It is important to recognize the

*implications*of**Σ**. When^{n}_{i=1}(X_{n})^{m}= Z^{m}**n**,**m**, the**X**and_{i}**Z**are*integers,*is an exact Diophantine expression of the*form*of the logical structure of the transfinite substrate as it is communicated to the 3S-1t domain. For this reason, we call it the**. It should be clear that the Diophantine equations yielded by this expression are appropriate for the mathematical analysis of the combination of unitary quantum particles. When the Diophantine expressions it yields are equations with***Conveyance Expression**integer*solutions, they represent stable combinations of quantum equivalence units, and when they do not have integer solutions, the expressions are*inequalities*representing asymmetric, and therefore,*unstable*structures.
In
the quantized nine-dimensional domains of TDVP, the variables of the Conveyance
Equations are necessarily integers, making them Diophantine equations, because only
the integer solutions represent quantized combinations. When

**n = m = 2**, we have the Pythagorean Theorem equation for which the integer solutions are the Pythagorean Triples. When**n = 3**and**m = 2**, the Conveyance Equation yields the inequality of Fermat’s Last Theorem, excluding binomial combinations from the stable structures that elementary particles may form. On the other hand, the Diophantine Conveyance Expression when**n = m = 3**, integer solutions produce trinomial combinations of elementary particles that*will*form stable structures.*This explains why there is something rather than nothing, and why quarks are only found in combinations of three.*
Embedded within the transfinite substrate
are three dimensions of space and three dimensions of time that are temporarily
contracted during observations, and condensed into the distinctions of spinning
energy (energy vortices) that form the structure of what we perceive as the
physical universe. In the humanly observable domain of 3S-1t, this spectrum
ranges from the photon, which is perceived as pure energy, to the electron,
with a tiny amount of inertial mass (0.51 MeV/c

^{2}≈ 1 x10^{-47}kg.) to quarks ranging from the “up” quark at about 2.4 MeV/c^{2}, to the “top” quark at about 1.7 x10^{5 }MeV/c^{2}, to the Hydrogen atom at about 1x10^{9}MeV/c^{2}(1.67 x10^{-27}kg.), to the heaviest known element, Copernicum (named after Nicolaus Copernicus) at 1.86 x10^{-24}kg^{[1]}. So the heaviest atom has about 10^{23}times, that is, about 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times heavier than the inertial mass of the lightest particle, the electron. All of the Elements of the Periodic Table are made up of stable vortical distinctions that are known as fermions, “particles” with an intrinsic angular spin of 1/2, or they are made up of combinations of fermions.**Table One,**above, lists the fermions that make up the Hydrogen atom and their parameters of spin, charge and mass based on experimental data.
Bohr’s
solution of the EPR paradox, validated by the Aspect experiment and many
subsequent experiments refined to rule out other possible explanations, tells
us that newly formed fermions do not exist as localized particles until they impact
irreversibly on a receiver constituting an observation or measurement. In the
TDVP unified view of reality, every elementary particle, every distinct entity
in the whole range of particles apparently composed of fermions, is drawn from
the continuous transfinite substrate of reality when it is registered as a
finite distinction in an observation or measurement. Our limitations of observation
and measurement and the dimensional structure of reality result in our
perception of fermions as separate objects with different combinations of
inertial mass and energy. What determines the unique mix that makes up each
type of observed particle? To answer this question, we must continue our
investigation of the rotation of the minimum quantal units across the four dimensions
of space, time and the additional dimensions revealed by the mathematics of
TDVP.

One
of the most important invariant relationships between dimensional domains is
the fact that each

**n**-dimensional domain is embedded in an**n+1**dimensional domain. This means that all distinctions of extent, from the ninth-dimensional domain down, and the distinctions of content within them, are inextricably linked by virtue of being sequentially embedded. Because of this intrinsic linkage, the structure of any distinction with finite extent and content, from the smallest particle to the largest object in the universe, reflects patterns existing in the logical structure of the transfinite substrate. Such a distinct object will always have in its content, combinations of the forms reflecting those patterns. In a quantized reality, the dimensionometric forms of such objects will be symmetric and a multiple of the smallest unit of measurement,
[1]
Cn and atomic number 112 was created in 1996. It is an extremely radioactive
synthetic element that can only be created in a laboratory. The most stable
known isotope is copernicium-285 (ref Wiki)

## No comments:

## Post a Comment