1=1

1+2=3

3

^{2}+4^{2}=5^{2}
3

^{3}+4^{3}+5^{3}=6^{3}
Using a common analogy, one might say that science and technology
as we know them today constitute just the tip of the iceberg. Approximately 90%
of an iceberg floating in the ocean is beneath the surface. Today’s science has
been looking only at the tip of reality; most of it is hidden. But, like most analogies,
this analogy is not perfect. Most of today’s science is based on and limited to
materialistic concepts. If the sum total of today’s scientific knowledge is the
tip of an iceberg, physical reality is the rest of the iceberg,

*plus*all the oceans of the world. As we shall see, simple math shows us that reality is much more than that which has weight and takes up space.
In fact, it has been proved mathematically that reality is
infinite.

The mathematics used by scientists today has, as its most
important system of logic, ‘the calculus’ of infinitesimals which was developed
by Leibniz and Newton, about 350 years ago. Almost all of our detailed
understanding of physical reality and the resulting technology we have today,
employs ‘the calculus’, but the calculus of Newton and Leibniz simply does not
work at the quantum level. Why? Because it depends on the assumption that
reality can be divided into ever smaller bits. This is not actually the case.
We have known for more than 70 years that we exist in a quantized world. There
is a smallest bit, beyond which no division is possible. The calculus works as
well as it does only because that smallest bit is so much smaller than anything
we can directly measure, that for the purposes of building things from skyscrapers
to microscopic electronic circuits, the error is not significant. But for
describing quantum phenomena, the calculus is totally inappropriate and leads to much of the confusion that causes scientists to think that quantum experiments produce weird results.

Max Planck, who discovered the fact that we live in a
quantized universe, said: “Science advances from funeral to funeral!” meaning
that scientists, like most people, get locked into a paradigm, - a way of
thinking, and cannot see beyond it. Right now, they can’t seem to see beyond
the calculus and binary logic. But in order to begin to investigate the rest of
the iceberg, we have to go beyond the calculus and binary logic.

Binary logic is the basis of a mathematical system called
Boolean algebra and today’ computers are simple binary computing machines.
Again, this has been sufficient for today’s technology for the most part, but,
like the calculus, it is inadequate to deal with quantum phenomena and the
inclusion of consciousness, which quantum physics demands. What does work, is
the Calculus of Distinctions and triadic logic. They are basic to the
Close-Neppe paradigm. But, you may think, if I don’t understand the calculus of
Newton, how can I expect to understand a new calculus and logic? Fortunately
they are more basic than ‘the calculus’ and binary logic, and easier to
understand!

OK. With that intro, we are ready to start. Contemplate the
symmetrical sequence of equations above and below. They are known as
Diophantine equations (after the Greek mathematician Diophantus). Notice that
they progress from I to 3 dimension-wise (indicated by power: a 2D area is an
integer squared, a 3D volume is an integer cubed. All symmetric particles are volumetric.

1=1 =1

1+2=3 =3

3

^{2}+4^{2}=5^{2 =25}
3

^{3}+4^{3}+5^{3}=6^{3 =216}
## No comments:

## Post a Comment