**SPACE, TIME AND CONSCIOUSNESS**

EVERY THING IS
EXPLAINABLE!

Let me explain:

By including
consciousness in the equations of science (TDVP), Dr. Vernon Neppe and I have
reached the point where we have everything we need to explain every

*thing*. For example, I can explain exactly why it takes three quarks to form a proton or neutron, and why it takes three types of elementary particles to form the stable atoms that make up the physical universe. I can explain why fermions have ½ spin, and why the Cabibbo angle and other particle-mixing angles are what they are.
Does this mean that we
have the “Theory of Everything” (TOE) dreamed about by physicists since Einstein
hypothesized that there should be a unified field theory that would explain all
of the known physical forces? No.

Those who think there is
a TOE out there waiting to be discovered have not understood Gӧdel’s
Incompleteness Theorems. I will explain this, but first, I must explain the
difference between explaining every

*thing*and a theory of everything. The word ‘thing’ refers to a finite physical object or concept. The word ‘everything’ means all that exists. To clarify: when physicists talk about a TOE, they are not actually talking about a theory of everything. They are talking about a theory of every*thing*, i.e. a complete physical theory. But, as I will explain, even that is problematic in light of Gӧdel’s Incompleteness Theorems.
Before I get into
discussing Gӧdel’s Incompleteness Theorems, I will state four fundamental
truths that can be proved conclusively with what we now know:

1.
Reality, which includes the physical
universe, is an

**logical system.***infinite*
2.
The physical universe, available through
the physical senses, is only a small fraction (less than 5%) of Reality.

3.
Reality is expanding in all nine finite
dimensions, not just the three and one-half dimensions of relativistic
space-time.

4.
Reality is more than an infinite logical
system, it is an Infinite Intelligence that encompasses space, time and
consciousness.

As an independent
sentient being, you have the right to agree, disagree or reserve judgement
concerning these four statements. But they rest on the solid foundations of proved
theorems of axiomatic geometry, mathematics, logic, and physical science. These
theorems include the Pythagorean Theorem, Fermat’s Last Theorem, the axiomatic
principles of Relativity and Quantum Physics, and Gӧdel’s Incompleteness
Theorems. I am as sure of them as I am
that I exist. If I can, I will impart that certainty to you in this
presentation.

I have touched on the importance
and applications of the Pythagorean Theorem, Fermat’s Last Theorem, the
axiomatic principles of Relativity and Quantum Physics, and Gӧdel’s
Incompleteness Theorems in these posts, and Dr. Neppe and I have published a
book (Reality Begins with Consciousness) and a number of papers dealing with
their applications in TDVP, but these foundation theorems are so important to
TDVP in general, and the four truths stated above, in particular, that I want
to elaborate on them a little more here.

**Gӧdel’s Incompleteness Theorems**

The detailed proof of
Gӧdel’s Incompleteness Theorems is beyond the scope of this discussion, but
understanding their meaning, importance and impact on human thought, are not. I
highly recommend the book “Gӧdel’s Proof” by Ernest Nagel and James R. Newman
to anyone who may want to pursue a deeper understanding than I can provide
here. This book was written for the non-mathematician. In their words: “The
details of Gӧdel’s proofs in his epoch-making paper are too difficult to follow
without considerable mathematical training. But the basic structure of his demonstrations
and the core of his conclusions can be made intelligible to readers with very
limited mathematical and logical preparation.”

In a nutshell, Gӧdel’s
Incompleteness Theorems

*prove*that no internally consistent logical system is ever complete. I emphasize the use of the word*prove*here, because you need to understand that a theorem is not a theory. If it is a theorem, is has been proved. Another way to put Gӧdel’s proof is: In any system of logic, mathematics or geometry, logically legitimate questions can be raised that cannot be answered within the system.
Let this sink in a
little. This explains why questions like why it takes three quarks to form a
stable proton or neutron, why the Cabibbo mixing angle for quarks is 13.02
degrees, or why the elementary particles making up normal atomic structure have
½ intrinsic spin, are not explainable in the current scientific paradigm.

Gӧdel’s Incompleteness
Theorems do

*say that there are questions like this that can*__not__*never*be answered; they only say that there are questions that cannot be answered within the paradigm in which they were formed. They may, however, be answerable in a new, more comprehensible paradigm. This, in fact, describes the nature of science and human thought in general. Science, and any system of logical thought, however internally consistent, is never complete. With this in mind, let’s return to the four fundamental truths stated above.**Reality is a logical system, and as such, it is**

*infinite*
Reality is the ultimate
logical system, which all conceptual models, scientific, mathematical,
geometrical, philosophical, theological, spiritual, or whatever, attempt to
model. Gӧdel’s Incompleteness Theorems prove that Reality, as

*the*original logical system, is always incomplete from the perspective of finite beings. No matter how many*things*we explain, the*everything*of Reality will always be beyond those explanations. Whenever we expand the logical system of our current understanding to explain something heretofore inexplicable, we will find that Reality presents us with new questions that cannot be explained within even our new paradigm. Thus, Reality is an infinite logical system.**The physical universe is a small fraction of Reality**

Application of the
principles of relativity and quantum physics imply that our physical senses and
extensions of them are reduction valves. That is to say that they function not
to bring

*all*of Reality into our physical experience, but actually to keep most of Reality out, and bring only a very small part into our physical experience. In fact, our current knowledge of the central nervous system of sentient beings like us suggests that our brains are capable of handling much more than that delivered to them by the senses and neural pathways. Evidence provided by the Hubble space probe and TDVP TRUE analysis strongly support this conclusion.**Reality is expanding in nine finite dimensions**

Dr.
Neppe and I have developed a comprehensive model that incorporates nine finite
dimensions based on the principles of relativity, quantum physics and number
theory. Its implications, are vast and far-reaching. It explains why there are
no absolute beginnings or ends, only change. In conjunction with the first
Truth, it explains many previously inexplicable experimental observations, and
implies, among other things, that consciousness, like mass and energy, obeys
the laws of conservation, suggesting that survival of consciousness after the
death and destruction of the physical body is not only possible, but probable.

**Reality is an Infinite Intelligence encompassing space, time and consciousness**

This
concept is considered by most people to be objectively unprovable. Some people,
including some scientists, accept it, and some reject it. Many claim to have proof
by personal experience. It has been considered by organized science and
religion to be a matter of personal belief and faith. This is no longer the
case. It is logically proved on the basis of the other three truths. Reality is
an infinitely logical system that human beings and man-made models reflect imperfectly
in mass, energy and consciousness in three dimensions of space and one of time.
Proof of this truth changes the world and our understanding of it profoundly.

*As far as I am concerned, these four statements are facts that have been proved beyond doubt and are thus unassailable, absolute Truths. The implications of these four truths are profound and far-reaching in their practical implications.*
This comment has been removed by the author.

ReplyDeleteThanks Olane S-M (jef) for your criticisms. Are you drinking again? You will see eventually that when dimensionality is properly defined and the Diophantine nature of quantized reality is not ignored, the re-formulation of science within consciousness will answer many questions. For example, there are no mistakes and no ambiguity in my mathematical proof explaining why only three quarks can combine to form the stable structures of the physical universe.

Deletenope no booze anymore Ed, only one glass a day sometimes; your Goedel paragraphs are correct; there can't be a complete Toe (as you and Vernon claimed earlier); yet you also cannot reformulate physics as quantum field theory with your diophantine equations; you forget there are already many measurements; as for the three quarks, hmm hardly a proof, in protons there also exist sea-quarks (virtual) and at the LHC they found the penta-quark. For the

Deleterest you may delete these last three posting, just wanted you to let you know i disagree

with the way you talk about physics and claiming to be better than Einstein; ridiculous.

For me physics is important and thus i am critical about such claims as you make.

PS Olanesti is a village in South Moldova where i do charity work.

Thank you jef. I understand your comment. It is coherent. I understand a glass of wine now and then is good for the heart. Of course just because I may score higher on an IQ test than Albert Einstein certainly doesn't make me better than him. In my mind (I know you disagree) I am carrying forward what he, Oscar Klein, Theodore Kaluza and Wolfgang Pauli started, the explanation of reality in terms of multi-dimnsional geometry.

DeleteI applaud your motivation to do charity work. Do you have a personal connection with Moldovia? I understand Moldovan wine is excellent.