FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM PART 3
Why is FLT65 important in regard to understanding quantum physics and consciousness? Because all reality exists in whole number multiples of the smallest possible quantum. This means that Diophantine (whole number) equations provide the perfect mathematics to describe objective reality, and the equation of Fermat's Last Theorem is a Diophantine equation. When FLT is applied to the Diophantine equations describing the combination of elementary particles, it explains why quarks can only combine in threes. This leads directly to the discovery of the third form of the substance of reality, linking consciousness to subatomic reality.
A BRIEF HISTORY OF FLT and FLT65.
Sometime in 1636 or 1637, Pierre de Fermat wrote in Latin in the margin of a book on Diophantine the first known statement of a theorem that became known as “Fermat’s Last Theorem” (FLT). His ‘marvelous’ proof ,was never found and FLT remained without formal proof for more than three centuries. Because of this, it is perhaps the most famous theorem in the history of mathematics. In modern representation, FLT is stated as follows:
In 1965, three decades before Wiles’ proof was announced, the author, Edward R. Close, produced a proof of FLT. It was completed in 1965 and is, therefore, referred to in this paper as FLT65. A brief summary of the history of the proof is provided, and an exact copy of the original FLT65 proof is presented in Appendix A.
was still early in his career: At that point he Bachelor’s
it was first published ,as an appendix, pages 93 – 99, in “The Book of Atma” . Over the years, the author attempted to get FLT65 peer reviewed and published in mathematics journals several times. These attempts did not succeed for reasons that are discussed in detailin this paper.
The the author came to succeeding was with the Journal of Number Theory in April 1985. The editor then, Dr. Hans Zassenhaus, was encouraging; and, because he could not find a willing peer reviewer, offered to review it himself. While Dr. Zassenhaus was reviewing FLT65, the author’s career took him to several remote locations in the Middle East over a period of several years, making correspondence very slow and difficult. Before the process could be completed, Dr. Zassenhaus retired, and the next Editor of the Journal was not very interested in “simple” proofs of FLT. Later, upon returning to the US, the author attempted to resume their correspondence and learned that, unfortunately, Dr. Zassenhaus had passed away.