Showing posts with label Theory of Everything. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theory of Everything. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 4, 2018

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS



QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Who and what are we? Where did we come from, and where are we going? What is the meaning of life? --There seem to be more questions than answers, but, if you want to know who you are, try writing down a list of questions on one side of a ledger and your best answers opposite them on the other side. How you write your list, and what you put in it, will reveal a lot about who you are. If you want to try this exercise, and you are serious about it, please stop reading now, and start writing your list of questions and answers before you read any farther. After you have gone as far as you can go with your list, then come back and read the rest of this post.

Caution: If you peek ahead before writing your list, you will jeopardize the integrity of the exercise because that will contaminate the question of who you are, with who you want to be.

Huh-uh, No-No! No Peeking!

What does your list and how you write it, say about you? I think, regarding questions and answers, most people fall into one of two categories: thinkers or doers. If you write every question you can think of before you write any answers, and the list is still incomplete, you are a thinker. If you write only the questions that you think are important, and write at least some answers as you go, you are a doer.

The difference between thinkers and doers is profound: It’s the difference between a theorist and a pragmatist, a philosopher and an engineer, an idealist and a realist, an optimist and a pessimist, a Plato and an Archimedes. If you are a Big-Bang Theory fan (the TV series, not the scientific theory), Sheldon is the thinker and Penny is the doer. Caution: you should refrain from judging one of these modes of questioning and answering as good or bad, because the world needs both. For example, architects are thinkers, while carpenters, plumbers and electricians are doers, planners are thinkers, and those who implement the plans are doers.

Of course, as with any psychological categorization, almost no one is one hundred percent thinker or one hundred percent doer, most of us are a mixture of both, and then there are a few who are neither. They are called politicians.

The extreme thinker, in addition to thinking about things, thinks about thinking. As Penny would put it, “Good grief! Jibber-jabber about jibber-jabber!” The extreme doer does, does and re-does just for the joy of doing. As Sheldon would put it: “One should stay far away as possible from, and out of the way of anyone who is so afflicted!”

So, do you want to see my list?  --I thought you’d never ask!

Q: Why is there something rather than nothing? A: Because by definition, nothing does not exist.

Q: Are there questions that have no answer? A: Probably. And this may be one of them.  

Q: Are there answers for which there are no questions? A: Yes, and here are two of them: your consciousness, and the universe.

Q: Can there ever be a theory of everything? A: No. Because a theory of everything must have everything in it, otherwise it is not a theory of everything, and if a theory has everything in it, it is identical with reality, and is therefore not a theory.

Of course, this is just the beginning of my list, and in case you are wondering, I wrote my questions first, and then came back and started writing the answers, and no, I haven’t finished my list of questions yet either. Also, I could write a paragraph or two, --maybe a book-- about each of my question and answers. And, before you say it, yes, Penny, it is “jibber-jabber about jibber-jabber!”

Saturday, September 30, 2017

Monday, April 25, 2016

CONSCIOUSNESS AND GEOMETRY



WHAT IS CONSCIOUSNESS?

The goal of natural science from the beginning has been to explain everything. In modern times, this quest has been articulated as the search for a ‘theory of everything’ abbreviated as TOE. Einstein’s unsuccessful quest for a unified field theory, a theory combining all the forces in the universe in one consistent theory, has been interpreted by physicists since Einstein as a quest for a TOE, reflecting the belief that everything can be explained in terms of physical principles. For twenty years I have been saying to anyone who would listen that there can be no real TOE unless consciousness is included in the equations describing reality. See “Transcendental Physics”, page 208. I am not alone in this, others, like Peter Russell, Sir Roger Penrose, Stuart Hammeroff, and Vernon Neppe, to name a few, have been saying something similar. But mainstream science has not been able to define what consciousness is, let alone represent it in the equations of a TOE.
To understand why modern science has not been able to put consciousness into the equations describing the laws governing the physical world, and why modern science has found no way even to define consciousness in relation to physical reality, we must go to the roots of the axiomatic approach used in modern mathematics. We must go back nearly 2,600 years to a period of about 370 years in length, to the world of Pythagoras (582 -507 BC), Plato (428 -348 BC), Euclid (325 -265 BC), and Archimedes (287 -212 BC), and review the ideas of these ancient Greek natural philosophers, because they formalized the ideas that make up the foundations of the modern understanding of geometry, because, as I will explain, consciousness and geometry are intimately related.

The axiomatic approach, developed by the Greeks, starts with the definition of a set of self-evident facts (axioms) and then derives or deduces logical conclusions that must be true if the axioms are true. Pythagoras used the axiomatic/deductive method to prove his theorems. Plato regarded axioms as reflections of a ‘perfect’ reality of which matter and energy were only imperfect reflections.  Euclid formalized the axiomatic approach applied to geometry in his ‘Elements’ of Geometry. And Archimedes applied the axiomatic approach to practical problems, and became the first engineer and experimental scientist in the modern sense. The difference between Archimedes’ pragmatism and Plato’s idealism is roughly the same as the difference between the experimental and theoretical scientists today. Most thinkers today will agree that we need both Platonic and Archimedean scientists, but in this discussion, I intend to show how the predominance of the Archimedean approach in modern science has led to a misunderstanding of what geometry and consciousness actually are. And we must go back to Euclid to see where and how the thinking deviated from the path that leads to defining consciousness.

Using the axiomatic approach that emerged from the thinking of the three Greek philosophers, Pythagoras, Plato and Euclid, as pragmatically interpreted by Archimedes, early modern scientists, notably Descartes and Laplace, diverted scientific thought into the dualistic interpretation of reality that led to the reductionist materialistic philosophy of science prevalent today, reflected in the ‘Standard Model’ of physics. Reductionist materialism leads naturally to a belief in absolute determinism as reflected in Descartes and Laplace’s statements in the 1700’s to the effect that it would only take a few years for scientists to determine the initial conditions of the universe, after which the complete history and fate of the universe could be calculated using Newtonian mechanics. A more recent statement of belief in determinism is found in Stephen Hawking’s “A Brief History of Time’, 1988, predicted a TOE by the year 2000. …Of course that didn’t happen.
In the reductionist worldview of modern science, geometry and consciousness have one thing in common: they are both relegated to non-substantive roles in the universe, related only secondarily to the dynamics of matter and energy. In modern mainstream science, geometry is seen as the description of space-time, a passive backdrop to the dynamic interactions of matter and energy. And consciousness is seen as an emergent feature of matter and energy at certain, as yet not well-defined levels of complexity. In this view, the geometric features of space-time are shaped by variations of mass and energy throughout the universe; and consciousness is seen as a more or less developed awareness, localized in complex organic life forms.


On the other hand, the theories of relativity and quantum mechanics, verified many times over by empirical data, suggest in different ways, that these conceptualizations of consciousness and geometry are flawed, and if not completely incorrect, at the very least, incomplete. Relativity, for example, reveals that the measurable features of physical reality depend upon the location and velocity of the observer relative to the objects of observation, and quantum mechanics tells us that the physical form exhibited by a quantum system depends upon choices made by a conscious observer. In both cases, the reality we can observe, measure or in any way experience is affected by the conscious observer. Based on these clues, is it possible that mainstream science has it backward? Could it be that instead of being secondary and emergent, geometry and consciousness are actually fundamental aspects of existential reality? 

I will press on to show the relationship between consciousness and geometry as a fundamental feature of reality in the next post.

Friday, June 19, 2015

WHAT ARE DIMENSIONS

WHAT ARE DIMENSIONS?
By Edward R Close
June 19, 2015



Length, Width, Height, curled-up, space-like, time-like, separate, connected, embedded - What are Dimensions? 

Do we live in 3 dimensions? 
Do we live in a 4-dimensional domain?
Or are there more dimensions existing beyond Einstein's space-time?

Learn how the extra dimensions proposed in the Close/Neppe TDVP science of the future relate to familiar known dimensions, what they are, and even where they are located. This new understanding of the reality of extra dimensions opens the door to a science that includes consciousness and spirituality.




If the video does not appear above, or does not render properly, you can click this link to watch the video on YouTube:


https://youtu.be/g7CZ0lH7qMU

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

True Quantum Units, 3 Dimensions of Time and the Big Bang Myth



True Quantum Units, 3 Dimensions of Time and the Big Bang Myth
 By Edward R Close, PhD
May 5, 2015



The Close-Neppe Theory of Everything unites relativity, quantum physics, and cosmology, explaining and providing new meaning for many of the mysteries of the current scientific paradigm. In this video you will learn about 2 current mysteries, how they are resolved, and what that means about the Big Bang.  1. Why is there something rather than nothing? 2. Why are Hydrogen atoms stable? 3. Why there was no Big Bang.

Here is our latest video!



If you do not see the video above, you can click this link to watch it on YouTube: