Sunday, December 8, 2013

Updated Article on Consciousness and the elements of the Periodic Table


TRIADIC EXPLANATION OF THE PERIODIC TABLE OF ELEMENTS

Introduction
The Periodic Table, besides being a list of the elements that make up the physical universe, reflects, in the atomic number, mean atomic weight and grouping of elements with similar chemical properties, logical patterns underlying the physical structure of the universe. Where do these patterns come from? Application of the Calculus of Distinctions1 within the Triadic Dimensional Distinction Vortical Paradigm2 has suggested that the patterns can be explained in the context of a nine-dimensional spinning reality with the application of the Calculus of Distinctions, Dimensional Extrapolation and the principles of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics3. The purpose of this discussion is to explore that possibility.

What we know about the elements of the Periodic Table is almost entirely based on experimental data from investigations of just five distinct entities. They are known as the photon, the electron, the up-quark, the down-quark, and the strange quark. Table One lists these distinctions with two of the measureable parameters that characterize them: charge and mass.

TABLE ONE
Elementary Particle Charge & Mass
Particle
  Symbol
Charge
(Coulomb)
Mass  (m)
(MeV/c2)
Photon
Ɣ
0
0
electron
e
-1
0.511
up quark
u
+23
1.5–3.3
down quark
d
13
3.5–6.0
Strange quark
s
13
70 – 132



Elementary Particles, Stability and the Structure of the Universe
It is an over-simplification to call these entities particles, since they can appear as particles or waves of energy, depending on how we choose to observe them. Of these five elementary entities, only two, the photon and the electron, enjoy separate, stable existence for any length of time. The other three are only detected as components of larger more stable particles. The stable structure of the matter that makes up the physical universe available to us for observation is composed of electrons, up quarks and down quarks. The atoms of the elements of the Periodic Table consist of specific, relatively stable arrangements of these three entities. Electrons orbit around atomic nuclei composed of neutrons and protons, and neutrons and protons are composed of up and down quarks as shown in Table Two.

Table Two
Components of Atomic Nuclei
Entity
Symbol
Consists of
Charge
Proton
P+
u + u + d
+1
Neutron
N0
u + d + d
0

Normalization
Except for the electron, the data for the mass of the particles in Table One are presented as ranges of values. The mass of the electron has been directly determined to be 0.511 MeV/c2, while the masses of the other elementary particles are indirectly determined as energy equivalents from particle collider detector and collector data. The mass values are non-integer decimal fractions because the convenient standards adopted for the units of measurement (MeV/c2) do not happen to be integer multiples of the smallest possible unit of mass. Because energy only occurs in multiples of a smallest unit, when measured in the ultimately smallest possible quantized units, the numerical values of the actual masses of these particles must be integers, so we are justified in normalizing the data to integral values for purposes of comparison and calculation.
The normalized mass values for electrons and up and down quarks in Table Three are obtained by simply taking the smallest elementary mass, that of the electron, (0.511 MeV/c2) as unitary. Then to convert the mass of the up quark and down quark into multiples of that standard unit, we divide the average of each particle’s range of empirical data by 0.511and round the results to the nearest whole number. Even if the basic unit we have derived in this way is not be the actual smallest possible unit, because mass and energy are quantized, it will be a multiple of the real quantum unit, and the normalized values will reflect the relative proportionality of the actual masses of the particles. The strange quark has been included in these tables even though, unlike the up and down quarks, it is not a constituent of ordinary matter. It is included because it is the natural decay source of up and down quarks.
Because charge is a product of spin, we have also normalized it to avoid fractions by simply taking the charge of the electron as - 3. This normalizes the charge of the up quark to + 2 and the down quark to - 1. Again, as with mass, we are justified in normalizing the measure of charge because the standard unit, the Coulomb, a standard of convenience, is not an integral multiple of the actual quantum unit of charge, which may be either positive or negative. The balance, or zero sum of + and – charges in the decay process (called parity) reflects the operation of the Law of Conservation of Energy.

Table Three
Normalized Units
Particle
  Symbol
Charge
Mass
Photon

Ɣ
0
0
electron
e
- 3
1
up quark
u
+ 2
5
down quark
d
− 1
9
Strange quark
s
- 1
201

Why are the particles that appear to make up ordinary matter, i.e. the electron, proton and neutron, as stable as they are, and how do they arise from the substrate of reality? Consider a state, perhaps in the early, high-energy, high-temperature universe, when there was a great abundance of free quarks and decaying and decayed quarks, - i.e. the less massive quarks and electrons. There would probably have also been other short-lived energetic by-products of quark collisions and decay like photons and neutrinos, radiating off to infinity, and perhaps there were other types of free particles like those created in experimental particle colliders, but we are focusing here on the decayed and decaying quarks destined to form Hydrogen atoms and the other atoms of the periodic table. In such a high-energy state, there would be many decay and re-combination paths, but the over-all tendency, due to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, would be from more massive particles, like the strange quark to less massive like the up quark. If we trace the decay of strange quarks in a nine-dimensional domain, we may be able to determine how the stable combinations that make up the elements are formed.

Implications of the Resolution of the EPR Paradox for Particle Physics
Resolution of the EPR paradox by the Aspect experiment, borne out by many detailed and sophisticated experiments, requires that we accept the fact that these entities do not exist as localized particles except when their masses and/or energies are registered in a way that can be observed and measured. The nine-dimensional spin model of TDVP accommodates this very nicely: Elementary particles exist in nine dimensions, but we can only observe and measure them in 3S-1T. Between observations, their substance is spread across the nine dimensions, and even when observed, only part of their substance and structure is available for observation in 3S-1t.
We have presented relevant evidence and arguments for the following theoretical ideas elsewhere, but we posit them here as axiomatic statements:
1.      Elementary particles are created as the result of the interaction of the three universal processes of expansion, contraction and rotation or spin. Their cause is thus triadic.
2.      Reality exists within at least nine finite, sequentially-nested existential dimensions.
3.      We are only partially aware of five of these dimensions through our physical senses: three of space, one of time, and one of consciousness.
4.      The processes affecting the creation and combination of elementary particles to form meaningful structures are rooted in the dimensionometric forms of nine finite dimensions and one or more transfinite dimensions. The mathematical expression of this dimensionometric form is Σni=1 (Xn)m = Zm  (to be explained in more detail below).
5.      These particles are triadic in nature, comprised of a universal substance which manifests as matter, energy and consciousness interacting in the nine-dimensional domain.
The Origin of the Particles that form the Elements of the Periodic Table
How do waves and particles form in the first place? Consider an elementary contraction in the substance of reality characterized as a distinction. Call that distinction D1. We have posited that its existence is made manifest by the interaction of mass, energy and consciousness, postulated to be three different aspects of the same thing. As demonstrated in our discussion of intrinsic spin and the Cabibbo angle6, this elementary distinction is rapidly spinning. With no external influence, and therefore no preferred reference frame, the distinction spins in nine dimensions, and each plane of rotation will cause it to resist movement like a spinning gyroscope. This resistance to movement, or inertia, is interpreted as mass. If the particle is spinning in more than one plane of rotation, each spinning plane may contribute to the total inertia of the particle. Since inertia is quantized, if the particle is spinning in nine dimensions, it will possess at least nine units of inertia. If we accept that these units are equivalent to units of mass normalized as we’ve done above, then such a particle is inertially equivalent to the down quark in Table Three.
Under the entropic expansive action characterized by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, strange quarks and down quarks decay into up quarks, releasing photons and neutrinos. This process, documented in many experiments, conforms to the Law of Conservation of Mass and Energy. Nothing is lost or destroyed in the process; some of the substance of the particle changes from one measurable form, mass, to another: energy. Table Four below illustrates how the elementary distinction, D1, recognized as the strange quark, s, in experimental observations, decays to form other less massive particles. These new particles formed by natural entropic decay have the exact normalized inertial masses that are characteristic of the other elementary particles, the down quark, up quark and the electron, the particles that make up all of the elements of the Periodic Table.

TABLE FOUR
Natural Decay Path of Elementary Entities
Elementary
Distinction
Mass in Normalized Units
Units Emitted as Energy*
New Mass in Normalized Units
New Entity
D1 = s
201
192 (4x46)
9
d
D2 = d
9
4
5
u
D3 = u
5
4
1
e
D4 = e
1
1
0
Ɣ
* Energy emitted is in the form of photons, Ɣ, and neutrinos. ve , one photon plus one neutrino = 4 normalized units. The energy of neutrinos and photons can vary, but, since energy is quantized, their energy can only consist of integer multiples of normalized units. There are some indications that neutrinos may have a miniscule amount of mass, so the neutrino emitted may have 1 unit of mass and one or two units of energy. The photon’s mass is zero, and its energy is proportional to its wave length, so the photons emitted in the decay process may have a wave length reflecting the energy of one or two units.
Notice that the four units emitted, identified as mass in the quarks, are measured as mass and energy in the photon and neutrino.  This indicates an equivalence between normalized mass units and energy, and more importantly, a transformation of the measurable aspect of the universal substance from mass to energy. We know that the transformation relationship between mass and energy is E = mc2. Since c2 is a constant, we may normalize the units of energy into units equivalent with our normalized mass units very easily as follows: The standard unit used to measure the energy of elementary particles is the MeV(one million electron volts) the standard unit used in measuring the mass of the particles in Table One is one million electron volts divided by the speed of light squared (MeV/c2), equivalent to 1.782662×10−36 kg., a very small fraction of a kilogram. So X units of mass in our normalized units in Table Two = X Mev/c2.  That occurs as a result of the Substituting m = X Mev/c2 into and E = mc2, we get E = X  (Mev/c2 ) c2 = X Mev. Thus the units in Table Four are normalized equivalence units measuring both mass and energy. Any given number, X, of normalized units of mass in this table is equivalent to X normalized units of energy.
We have also posited that the substance of reality is not just mass and energy, i.e. binary in mode, but triadic, existing in three forms: mass, energy and consciousness. Since mass and energy are measurable in our normalized units, it is reasonable to expect that consciousness might also be. If, e.g., like mass and energy, consciousness is quantized, and each unit of consciousness is equivalent to a constant multiple of energy units, then consciousness can also be also be measured in multiples of these normalized units of equivalence, and the processes that form the elements of the Periodic Table can be described and analyzed using them. Even though we have not yet defined what a unit of consciousness might consist of, we may be able to define it indirectly relative to energy and mass in terms of the equivalence units. Extending the logic of E = mc2, the mathematical relationship between mass and energy, the relationship between energy and consciousness, C, is probably of the form: C = Ek(t/c)n where t/c is the ratio of the minimum increments at the border of the T and C domains just as x/∆t  is the ratio at the border of the S and T domains, k is the maximum limiting rate of change of time with respect to consciousness, and n is > 2. Substituting, we have: C = mc2 k(t/c)n.
Notice that no units of consciousness appear in the decay process depicted in Table Three because it is a natural entropic process. So why don’t all elementary distinctions simply decay into photons and neutrinos that expand to infinity, resulting in a swift return to a state of maximum entropy, a state where there are no distinctions in the substance of reality? Regardless of how particles originate, something happens to counteract the action of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. What happens to perpetuate the negative entropy we see around us? The answer lies in the conveyance of the logic of the C-substrate (dimensions 7, 8 and 9 of the nine dimensional domain of reality) into the 3S-1T domain of observation, by the intrinsic form of the dimensionometric domains represented mathematically by the equation Σni=1 (Xn)m = Zm and by the action of one or more units of consciousness organizing mass and energy into stable structures reflecting the logic of the conscious substrate. In order for quarks to combine to form the stable sub-atomic particles we call protons and neutrons observable in the 3S-1t domain, they must meet the requirements of the Conveyance Expression equation when m = 3 and n = 2 as integer multiples of normalized units of mass, energy and consciousness. This is where Fermat’s Last Theorem enters the picture.
Fermat’s Last Theorem and the Combination of  Quantum Particles
Consider the combination of two elementary particles to form a new particle. This may be modeled by the Conveyance Expression when n = 2 and  m = 3. 
With n = 2 and m = 3, the expression Σni=1 (Xn)m = Zm  yields the equation (X1)3 + (X2)3 = Z3.
X1 and X2 represent the number of normalized units making up the particles, i.e. quarks, which combine to form the proton, P+ and the neutron, N0. (X1)3 and (X2)3 represent the volumes of two combining particles and Z3 represents the volume of the particle formed in the combination. These normalized units that make up quarks are the real building blocks of the universe. They are holistic in the sense that each unit carries the blueprint of matter, energy and consciousness within it, reflecting the logical patterns of the conscious substrate.
In nine dimensions, at the sub-quark level, whether measured as mass, energy or consciousness, the numerical values of the spinning entities in normalized equivalence units are integers and dimensionometrically equivalent. We will, therefore, call them Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence (TRUE). The increasing spin of the four elementary distinctions creates additional attractive and repulsive forces, and under the intelligent influence of the informed dimensionometric structure expressed by the Conveyance Equation, they exchange TRUE units so that combine to form new symmetric and therefore very stable sub-atomic components. All quantum processes involving TRUE units conform to the law of conservation of mass, energy and consciousness operating in 3S-1t macro-level observations.
Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence, or TRUE units, for short, are the Calculus of Distinction equivalents of the infinitesimals of the Calculus of Newton and Leibniz. The difference, and it is a very important one, is that TRUE units are finite and always have integer values. Consistent with the quantum nature of reality, there are no fractional TRUE units. While the value of the differentiation variable of a function in Newtonian Calculus may approach zero infinitely closely, the Calculus of Distinctions numerical values of both content and extent variables of the finite distinctions of mass, energy and consciousness are quantized and thus cannot be smaller than one TRUE unit. Thus the TRUE unit is the bottom, or limit of infinite descent for all variables. Because elementary particles are rotating extremely rapidly, regardless of the probabilistic distribution of density (such as that demonstrated in our analysis of the electron)6,  a TRUE unit occupies a perfectly symmetrical volume, and that volume is the same whether the content is measured as mass, energy or consciousness.
Using the axioms proposed above, and TRUE units, we will proceed to describe the triadic makeup of the Hydrogen atom and the other elements of the Periodic Table. The values of the mass of the elementary entities, in multiples of the TRUE unit, are determined by normalization of experimental data as described above; the values of the energy of the entities, also in multiples of the TRUE unit, are calculated using the established mathematical relationship between mass and energy (E = mc2); and the values of the measures of the consciousness of the elementary entities in multiples of the TRUE units are determined by application of the Conveyance Equation and the assumption that a mathematical relationship, analogous to E = mc2 exists between energy and consciousness.
At the quantum level, to be stable quantum particles, existing as finite three-dimensional distinctions, each of these volumes must be equivalent to either the volume of a single TRUE unit, or multiples of the volume of the TRUE unit. This means that X1, Y2 and Z must be integers.
Fermat’s Last Theorem tells us there are no integer solutions for this equation, which means that no two particles consisting of TRUE units, or integral multiples of TRUE units, can combine to form a new symmetrical entity. Such asymmetrical combinations of rapidly spinning entities will tumble or spiral, especially under the influence any external force, and will thus be far less stable than symmetric forms.
However, when n = m =3, the expression yields the equation
(X1)3 + (X2)3 + (X3)3= Z3,
which does have integer solutions. The first one (with the smallest integers) is
33 + 43 + 53 = 63
It is important to recognize that the equations produced by Σni=1 (Xn)m = Zm when n and m, and the Xi and Z are integers are mathematical expressions of the form of the logical structure of the C-substrate as it is conveyed to the 3S domain. For this reason, we will call this expression the Conveyance Expression. This expression, generalizing the summation of n finite m-dimensional distinctions, and the equations it generates when all variables are integers, including the equations of the Pythagorean Theorem and Fermat’s Last Theorem, prove to be indispensably useful in the mathematical analysis of the combination of elementary particles.

The simplest symmetric form in three-dimensional space is the sphere, and as noted above, we can assume that the TRUE unit of substance is spherical. If the particles are also spherical, their volumes are 4/3 π r13, 4/3 π r23, and 4/3 π r33, where r1, r2 and r3 are the radii of the particles. But, since the volumes of the particles are integral multiples of the TRUE unit, r1, r2 and r3 must be integer multiples of the radius of the TRUE unit; so let r1= X1RT, r2 = X2RT, and r3 = X3RT where X1, X2 and X3 are integers and RT is the radius of the TRUE unit.  The Conveyance Equation representation of the combination of the three particles becomes:

4/3 π (X1RT) 3 + 4/3 π (X2 RT) 3 + 4/3 π (X3RT) 3

The new particle, consisting of the three particles combined, is represented by the expression 4/3 π (ZRT) 3, where, Z is necessarily an integer, since no particle can contain fractional TRUE units, and we have:

4/3 π (X1RT) 3 + 4/3 π (X2 RT) 3 + 4/3 π (X3RT) 3 = 4/3 π (ZRT) 3

Dividing both sides of the equation by all of the common constant factors: 4/3, π and (RT)3, we have:

(X1)3 + (X2)3 + (X3)3= Z3, where the Xi and Z are integers representing the number of linear cross-sections of the TRUE volumes of each particle represented by the terms of the equation.
Since spinning elementary particles are symmetric, and multiples of TRUE units, which are also symmetric, the fact that this equation has integer solutions, while the equation (X1)3 + (X2)3 = Z3 does not, tells us that for the elementary particles in Table Three to combine to form the most stable, symmetric compound distinctions, three particles, not two, must combine.
Note that this conclusion is independent of the actual shape of the combining particles and is even independent of the size and substance of the TRUE unit. As long as the particles have the same symmetrical form, the shape factor, in this case, 4/3 π (RT )3, cancels out. They could, e.g., be any of the regular polyhedrons like tetrahedrons, with four equilateral triangular sides, hexahedrons (better known as cubes), with six square sides, octahedrons, etc.
Just as the intrinsic structure of dimensional domains of three or more dimensions causes the combination of two elementary particles to be asymmetric, it allows the combination of three particles to be symmetric and very stable.
We will limit the scope of the remainder of this mathematical description to the five particles that make up the elements of the Periodic Table, namely the electron, the up quark, the down quark, and the two composite particles, the proton and the neutron. At the point of observation, this set of particles forms an open system in the five-dimensional domain of space, time and consciousness (3S-1T-1C). As a finite physical system in the four dimensional domain of space-time, these elementary particles are subject to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which is expressed through the process of universal expansion toward maximum entropy; but this tendency toward maximum entropy is counteracted by the processes of contraction of the substance of reality into stable finite distinctions with high-velocity rotation and spin according to the pattern expressed through the form of the Conveyance Equation. The TRUE units are thus the substance of reality. We postulate that this substance of reality is triadic in nature, composed of mass, energy and consciousness. With the introduction of  the TRUE unit as the Calculus of Distinctions basic unitary distinction, and nine-dimensional spin as the dynamic nature of distinctions of  matter and energy supporting the logic of consciousness, we are re-integrating our understanding of physical reality with the awareness of the conscious substrate as the mathematically logical matrix from which physical reality originates.
Albert Einstein and Hermann Minkowski began this re-integration of the scientific description of reality with consciousness by recognizing the geometric nature of space and time as dimensional, establishing the concept of space-time4, and the nature of matter and energy as two different forms of the same substance. Bohr, Heisenberg and Schr introduced quantization, which ultimately requires the integration of consciousness into the process of observation and measurement. We are extending this integration to include the five additional finite dimensions indicated by the mathematics of Dimensional Extrapolation5, and including consciousness as the third aspect of the substance of reality. Even though Einstein coined the new term “space-time” describing the new concept of a four-dimensional geometric domain, and established the mathematical equivalence of matter and energy with E = mc2, he introduced no new terminology for the generic substance of reality. We will use the terms “essential substance” or “essence” to indicate the substance of reality manifesting triadically as matter, energy and consciousness.
Consistent with decay from the strange quark and down quark to the up quark, and stabilization through the dimensionometric structure described by the Conveyance Equation, the following tables describe the electron, up quarks, down quarks, protons, neutrons, and the elements Hydrogen, atomic number 1, through Calcium, atomic number 20, in terms of TRUE units.

The Elementary Particles in TRUE Units

Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
e
- 3
1
9
10
1,000
u
+ 2
5
3
8
512
d
- 1
9
-3
6
216
Notice the difference between the number of TRUE units representing the mass, energy and consciousness content of a particle and the volume of a particle. The volume of the particle (in the three observable dimensions of space) is equal to the total number of units cubed. Notice also, that as the influence of consciousness increases, the TRUE units observable as matter or energy decreases.

The Proton (P+)
Particle
Charge
Mass
Consciousness
Total
Volume
u
+ 2
5
5
10
1,000
u
+ 2
5
3
8
512
d
- 1
9
-3
6
216
Total
+ 3
19
5
24
1,728

The number of TRUE units representing the mass and energy content of a particle in this table are fixed numbers determined by normalization of empirical data, and the number of consciousness units for each particle is fixed by the requirements of the Conveyance Equation. The numbers in the “Total” column are the smallest possible integers consistent with the empirical data and the Conveyance Equation requirement that the sum of the three totals cubed must equal an integer cubed. Any other set of numbers in the “Consciousness” column would either be inconsistent with the empirical data or produce a negative and/or non-integer value of TRUE units in the Proton, violating the quantum requirement. Thus, even though at this point, we cannot directly measure the consciousness involved, we have calculated the TRUE units of consciousness from the Conveyance Equation. We can derive different consciousness unit numbers for e, u and d from different integral solutions of the Conveyance Equation, but the solution 63 + 83 + 103 = 123 is the smallest integral solution consistent with sign and parity requirements and the empirical data from particle colliders.

The Neutron (N0)
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
u
+ 2
5
5
10
1,000
d
- 1
9
-1
8
512
d
- 1
9
-3
6
216
Totals
         0
23
1
24
1,728
Notice that there is more mass/energy and less consciousness in the neutron than in the proton, and consistent with experimental data, particles with more mass have less volume.

ELEMENTS OF THE PERIODIC TABLE
The projection of the  logical patterns of the Conscious Substrate into the structures of the physical universe is accomplished by the conformance of the TRUE units making up the elementary particles to the requirements of the Conveyance Equation. This allows the formation of the uniquely stable combinations of quarks that are needed to form the elements supporting life forms capable of acting as physical vehicles of consciousness. By organizing the structure of elementary particles in this way, Primary Consciousness builds a universe in which it can function as individualized consciousness experiencing reality in finite form.

HYDROGEN
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
e
- 3
1
9
10
1,000
P+
+ 3
19
5
24
1,728
Totals
0
20
14
34
2,728
Notice that the electron, by rotating in nine dimensions, generates three units of charge (normalized here to three times unity). And the proton, rotating in the opposite direction, generates three units of charge of the opposite parity, resulting in an electrically stable atom.

TRITIUM (Isotope)
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
e
- 3
1
9
10
1,000
P+
+ 3
19
5
24
1,728
N0
0
23
1
24
1,728
Totals
0
43
15
58
4,456





HELIUM
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
2e
- 6
2
18
20
2,000
      2P+      
+ 6
38
10
48
3,456
2N0
         0
46
2
48
3,456
Totals
0
86
30
116
8,912

LITHIUM
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
3e
- 9
3
27
30
3,000
      3P+      
+ 9
57
15
72
5,184
4N0
         0
92
4
96
6,912
Totals
0
152
46
198
15,096

Beryllium
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
4e
- 12
4
36
40
4,000
      4P+      
+ 12
76
20
96
6,912
5N0
         0
115
5
120
8,640
Totals
        0
195
61
256
19,552

BORON
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
5e
- 3
5
45
50
5,000
      5P+      
+ 3
95
25
120
8,640
6N0
         0
138
6
144
10,368
Totals
0
238
76
314
24,008

CARBON
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
6e
- 3
6
54
60
6,000
      6P+      
+ 3
114
30
144
10,368
6N0
         0
138
6
144
10,368
Totals
0
258
90
348
26,736
NITROGEN
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
7e
- 3
7
63
70
7,000
      7P+      
+ 3
133
35
168
12,096
7N0
         0
161
7
168
12,096
Totals
0
301
105
406
31,192
OXYGEN
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
   Volume
8e
- 3
8
72
80
8,000
      8P+      
+ 3
152
40
192
13,824
8N0
         0
184
8
192
13,824
Totals
0
344
120
464
35,648
FLUORINE
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
9e
- 3
9
81
90
9,000
      9P+      
+ 3
171
45
216
15,552
10N0
         0
230
10
240
17,280
Totals
0
410
136
546
41,832

NEON
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
10e
- 3
10
90
100
10,000
     10P+     
+ 3
190
50
240
17,280
10N0
         0
230
10
240
17,280
Totals
0
430
150
580
44,560

SODIUM
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
11e
- 3
11
99
110
11,000
     11P+     
+ 3
209
55
264
19,008
12N0
         0
276
12
288
20,736
Totals
0
496
166
662
40,744

MAGNESIUM
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
12e
- 3
12
108
120
12,000
     12P+     
+ 3
228
60
288
20,736
12N0
         0
276
12
288
20,736
Totals
0
516
180
696
53, 472
ALUMINIUM
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
13e
- 3
13
117
130
13,000
     13P+     
+ 3
247
65
312
22,464
14N0
         0
322
14
336
24,192
Totals
0
582
196
778
59,656
SILICON
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
14e
- 3
14
126
140
14,000
     14P+     
+ 3
266
70
336
24,192
14N0
         0
322
14
336
24,192
Totals
0
602
210
812
62,384
PHOSPHOROUS
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
15e
- 3
15
135
150
15,000
     15P+     
+ 3
285
75
360
25,920
15N0
         0
345
15
360
25,920
Totals
0
645
225
870
66,840
SULFUR
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
16e
- 3
16
144
160
16,000
     16P+     
+ 3
304
80
384
27,648
16N0
         0
368
16
384
27,648
Totals
0
688
240
928
71,296
CHLORINE
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
17e
- 3
17
153
170
17,000
     17P+     
+ 3
323
85
408
29,376
18N0
         0
414
18
432
31,104
Totals
0
754
256
1,010
77,480
ARGON
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
18e
- 3
18
162
180
18,000
     18P+     
+ 3
342
90
432
31,104
22N0
         0
506
22
528
38,016
Totals
0
866
274
1,140
87,120
POTASSIUM
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
19e
- 3
19
171
190
19,000
     19P+     
+ 3
361
95
456
32,832
20N0
         0
460
20
480
34,560
Totals
0
840
286
1,126
86,392
CALCIUM
Particle
Charge
Mass/Energy
Consciousness
Total
Volume
20e
- 3
20
180
200
20,000
     20P+     
+ 3
380
100
480
34,560
20N0
         0
460
20
480
34,560
Totals
0
860
300
1,160
89,120



What we have shown, is how, in a nine-dimensional spin reality, stable structures are purposefully formed for use as vehicles through which the consciousness of the C-substrate may experience spacetime reality. 

No comments:

Post a Comment