WHY IS THERE SOMETHING RATHER THAN NOTHING?
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646 – 1716) is considered by many
historians to have been one of the greatest thinkers of all times. Truly a
polymath, he was a very gifted physician, lawyer, philosopher, linguist, mathematician,
and scientist.
He developed the differential and integral calculus used extensively in science
and engineering today. In 1671, Leibniz, in his “Principle of Sufficient Reason,” posited that there is an explanation
for every fact, an answer for every question. “This principle having been
stated,” Leibniz wrote, “the first question which we have a right to ask will
be: “Why is there something rather than nothing?”
I agree with Leibniz’s first principle. It is the basis of all
science and every endeavor to know and understand the nature of reality. I
would restate it in my own words as: There
is an explanation for every real thing, and every meaningful question can be
answered. Since Gӧdel’s proof of the incompleteness theorems, however, we
must add to this principle. We must now say: Everything can be explained, every question answered, but you may have
to expand your system of logic to find the answers to some questions. The
second part of Leibniz’s statement, suggesting that the first question we must
ask is: “Why is there something instead
of nothing?’ is as relevant today as it was in 1671, because modern science
has still not answered this ‘first’ question. The big bang theory is not an
answer, because it only raises further questions, such as: If the universe as
we find it originated in a big explosion, was there nothing before that? And,
if there was nothing, what caused the explosion?
We all agree that there is
something: the observable universe.
We exist in a reality of physical bodies, plants, animals and minerals, cities,
mountains and streams, oceans, planets, stars, and galaxies. Why does all this
exist? Was there ever a time when there was nothing?
Since there is a universe, could there ever have been nothing? We can agree
that science has found answers to many practical questions about how things
work, but, while taking advantage of that knowledge and creating useful technologies,
we have also created some very serious problems. I believe that until we back
up and answer that first question, we will continue to make mistakes and create
more and more dangerous problems in our environment.
Leibniz’s first question is not just an abstract philosophical question; it is a critical question. The survival of our species may well depend upon our getting the answer right.
Leibniz’s first question is not just an abstract philosophical question; it is a critical question. The survival of our species may well depend upon our getting the answer right.
We (Close and Neppe) have found that there could be no
universe without the third form of the substance of reality, gimmel, because of
the second law of thermodynamics which would cause any particle accidentally
formed by the big bang explosion to decay back to maximum entropy before it
could develop any stable structure. That third form had to be pervasive from
the very beginning of our universe, and before, in order for the first atom of
the physical universe to come out of any origin event like the big bang, whether
you want to call it God, Nature, or something else, gimmel had to exist forever,
without beginning or end.
Conclusion: Reality is
everything that has ever existed. Reality has always existed. There is no
beginning or end, only change. If the physical universe, as we find it now, had
a beginning, it was formed from, and in accordance with, the logical structure of
the Matrix of Reality. I choose to call the Reality Matrix the GOD Matrix. This
answer to the first question puts meaning and purpose back into science and human
existence.
For more details, read posts on TRUE units, Gimmel and TDVP in this blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment