PUTTING CONSCIOUSNESS INTO THE EQUATIONS PART 18

FILLING IN THE GAPS OF VOLUMETRIC STABILITY (PART 18)

The first clue to identifying the symmetric entity that fills a given gap in the sequence of TRUE-unit volumetric symmetry (Table 17Q) is its location relative to the other symmetric forms in the table. The compound that fills a given gap can only be formed from combinations of symmetric atoms and/or compounds that are smaller than it in total TRUE units.

For example, the (3x108)³ gap can only be filled by a compound entity composed of Helium [TRUE volume = (2x108)³] and Hydrogen or Deuterium [TRUE volume = (1x108)³].

The tables below identify symmetrical molecular entities that fill the gaps and complete the Periodic Table of Building Blocks. Table 18B1 is extracted from Table 18A and contains the extra generally unstable compounds and radicals that fill the gaps in the multiples of 108³.

TABLE 18A: TRUE-UNIT SYMMETRIC MOLECULAR COMPOUNDS: FILLING IN THE GAPS.

Compound	ג Units	Total TRUE	Valence	Percent ג Units	TRUE Volume	Comments
Helium Hydride HeH	384	504	+1	76. 2%	(3x108)3	Super acid Not found in Nature
Lithium Hydride Li and H2 (Deuterium)	512	672	+2	76. 2%	(4x108)3	Rare in Nature Very Reactive
(He)2H	640	826	+3	76. 2%	(5x108)3	Produced in Nuclear Fusion
Hydroxide HO	1, 174	1, 512	-1	77. 6%	(9x108)3	Building Block of Amino Acids
H2N	1, 174	1, 512	-1	77. 6%	(9x108)3	Common in Amino Acids
CH3	1, 174	1, 512	-1	77. 6%	(9x108)3	Common in Organic Compounds
H2O	1, 336	1, 692	0	78. 8%	(10x108)3	Water
H4N	1, 496	1, 848	+1	80. 9%	(11x108)3	Ammonium Ion
C2H	1, 686	2, 184	+3	77. 2%	(13x108)3	Major Component of Cysteine Amino Acid

While filling the gaps in the sequence of (n x108)³ symmetric structures in the Periodic Table, we find that there may be two or more compounds with the exact TRUE volume capable of filling the gaps, increasing in number as n increases. We also discover that, after n = 9, there are symmetric compounds equal in TRUE volume to some elements. H₂O, for example, has a TRUE volume of (10x108)³, the same TRUE volume as the inert gas Neon. The TRUE-unit analyses for the compounds are displayed in the Tables below.

Table 18: TRUE UNIT ANALYSES OF GAP COMPOUNDS

TABLE 18B 1 He; Helium Hydride, Valence = - 2 + 3 = +1

Compound	Particles	Mass/ Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
He + H	3e	3	315	318	32, 157, 432
	3P+	51	21	72	373, 248
	3N0	66	48	114	1, 481, 544
	Totals	120	384	504	34,012,224=(324)3 = (3x108)3

The proportion of Gimmel to TRUE is high at 76.19% for Helium Hydride. The TRUE-unit analyses continue below for other compounds that fill the gap. We now examine two other variants of Helium hydride (He)₂H.

Given that Helium and Hydrogen are very stable compounds, we would expect Helium and hydrogen combinations to be stable and they are.

Table 18B 2 he: (He)₂H, Valence = - 2 + 5 = +3

Atoms	Particles	Mass/ Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
(He)2H	5e	5	525	530	148,877,000
	5P+	85	35	120	1,728,000
	5N0	110	80	190	6, 859,000
	Totals	186	640	826	157,464,000=(540)3 = (5x108)3

The proportion of Gimmel to TRUE is high at 77.48% for (He)₂H.

We now move onto the next level of the atomic table. This time lithium should not be a multiple of 108 cubed as lithium is not a life-stable element. Yet lithium (deuterium) hydride formed from Lithium and Deuterium (H2) is a symmetrically stable gap compound at (4x108)³_. Moreover, the proportion of Gimmel to TRUE is high at 76.19% for lithium hydride.

Table 18c: TRUE UNIT ANALYSES OF Lithium (Deuterium) Hydride as a GAP COMPOUNDS, Valence = - 2 + 4 = +2

Atoms	Particles	Mass/ Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
Li + H2	4e	4	420	424	76, 225, 024
	4P+	68	28	96	884, 736
	4N0	88	64	152	3, 511, 808
	Totals	160	512	672	80,621, 568=(432)3 = (4x108)3

Possibly the most important and stable compound that exists and is critically important for life is water. How does water as hydrogen hydroxide fit into the gap profiles? Clearly we would hypothesize that it fits and, indeed, it does.

First we look at the hydroxyl radical, OH, formed from O and H1, because it is symmetrically stable and fills the (9x108)³ gap.

Table 18D 2: Deriving water: The Hydroxyl Ion, Valence = - 10 + 9 = -1

Atoms	Particles	Mass/ Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
H1+O	9e	9	945	954	868,250,664
	9P+	153	63	216	10,077,696
	1Cג+8N0	176	166	342	40,001,688
	Totals	338	1, 174	1, 512	918, 330, 048=(972)3 = (9x108)3

The proportion of Gimmel to TRUE is high at 77.64% for this radical that is part of water. We compare this now with water, which is as expected, also a multiple of 108 cubed. Remarkably the proportion of Gimmel to TRUE in Water is the highest of any compound we calculate at 78.95%! This affirms our hypothesis of Water being the highest of any of our stable symmetrical compounds.

We would expect Water to be high, even higher than the Hydroxyl radical. But it is interesting that hydroxyl is a symmetric, stable radical as expected (and, indeed, as required for water to show its stability.

Table 18d 3: H₂O, Water, Valence = -2 -8 + 10 = 0

Atoms	Particles	Mass/ Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
2(H)+O*	10e	10	1050	1060	1, 191, 016, 000
	10P+	170	70	240	13, 824, 000
	8N0+2Cג	176	216	392	54, 872, 000
	Totals	356	1,336	1,692	1,259,712,000 (10x108)3

We now examine several other radicals that fill the gaps in the Periodic table and are multiples of 108 cubed. We examine H₂N, NH₄ ammonium, then CH_3, and C₂H.

Table 18 E -1: NH₄ ammonium, Valence = 11 -2 – 8 = +1

Atoms	Particles	Mass/ Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
4H1+ N	11e	11	1, 155	1, 166	1, 585, 242, 296
	11P+	187	77	264	18, 399, 744
	4Cג+7N0	154	264	418	73, 034, 632
	Totals	352	1,496	1,848	1, 676, 676, 672=(11x108)3

It is certainly remarkable that the gimmel/TRUE ratio of ammonium is 80.95%, the highest of any radical we’ve analyzed!

We now look at some other radicals, but this time including CH₃ which is another gap compound multiple of 10 cubed and another radical, C₂H.

Table 18E -2 : H₂N, Valence = - 2 + 9 = +7

Atoms	Particles	Mass/ Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
2H + N	9e	9	945	954	868, 250, 664
	9P+	153	63	216	10, 077, 696
	9N0	176	166	342	40, 001, 688
	Totals	338	1,174	1,512	918, 330, 048=(972)3 = (9x108)3

The proportion of Gimmel to TRUE is high at 77.64% for H₂N as expected for this structure.

Even more so, the proportion of Gimmel to TRUE is extremely high for the ammonium radical at 80.95%. We would expect ammonium to be extraordinarily reactive, and indeed it is. Of course, ammonium radical is not stable itself, and it interacts with other chemicals.

Table 18F 1: CH₃, Valence = - 10 + 9 = -1

Atoms	Particles	Mass/ Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
C + 3H	9e	9	945	954	868,250,664
	9P+	153	63	216	10,077,696
	9N0	176	166	342	40,001,688
	Totals	338	1,174	1,512	918,330,048=(972)3 = (9x108)3

The proportion of Gimmel to TRUE is the typical high for a radical with many hydrogens plus a life-sustaining element at 77.64%.

Table 18 G 1: C₂H, Valence = 13 -2 – 8 = +3

Atoms	Particles	Mass/Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
2C + H	13e	13	1, 365	1, 378	2, 616, 662, 152
	13P+	221	91	312	30, 371, 328
	Cג+12N0	264	230	494	120, 553, 784
	Totals	498	1, 686	2,184	2,767,587, 264 =(1,404)3 =(13x108)3

The proportion of Gimmel to TRUE is the typical high for a radical with only one hydrogen at 77.19%.

Importantly, the two fundamental building blocks of our physical 3S-1t life are DNA[1] and RNA. The calculations are complex because of the number of neptrons involved. The elements constituting DNA and RNA are all multiples of 108 cubed, as expected. Therefore the cube roots remain integers. These chemicals are stable and symmetric. It is interesting that OH, H₂N, and CH₃ are components of amino acids that are building blocks of DNA and RNA and they fit into the multiple of 108 cubed prototype as expected. C₂H also fits this prototype.

We now briefly examine Fe, iron, as it is in the top 10 abundant elements, and also, very important in life. Some would argue it is so fundamental it should be on the “essential for life” list. We know it to be asymmetric, and elemental iron itself might not be pertinent. Yet, when in used combination it should be stable. So we would expect some special property for iron.

TABLE 18H 1: Deriving elemental IRON: Fe, Valence = -26 + 28 = 2

Atoms	Particles	Mass/ Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
Fe 0	26 e-	26	2730	2756	20933297216
	26P+	442	182	624	242970624
	30N0	660	480	1140	1481544000
	Totals	1128	3392	4520	22657811840= (6096.395)3

The gimmel to TRUE ratio is 3392/4520 = 0.7504 = 75.04%. This, as expected, based on Neptrons has a low proportion of gimmel. However, iron in any form might have the most gimmel of any of the most abundant elements [2]. ¹¹² We also tabulate Ferrous ionic iron (Fe²⁺) because it’s so important in life, for example, as a component of hemoglobin.

Table 18H2: Deriving Ferrous Iron: Fe2+, Valence = -26 + 28 = 2

Atoms	Particles	Mass/ Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
Fe++	26 e-	26	2730	2756	20933297216
	26P+	442	182	624	242970624
	30N0	660	480	1140	1481544000
	Totals	1128	3392	4520	22657811840= (6096.395)3

We could predict that Ferrous iron should be even more involved with life and key life compounds than elemental Fe⁰ . Moreover, we would hypothesize that Ferric iron Fe³⁺ should have less involvement with gimmel than Ferrous Fe²⁺. However, if we calculate these tables, the gimmel figures should be and are the same because valence and its possible energy impacts are not accounted for here.

The analysis is likely far more complex, however, because iron, Fe⁰, as an element may not be too relevant. By contrast, ferrous iron, the most stable and abundant type, becomes critically important as a bioavailable substance of life. But the figures in these Tables (18 J1 and 18J2), as expected, are identical because the tables are reflecting iron with a valence of two, therefore Fe²⁺ .

All known forms of life require ferrous iron. And it almost always physiologically requires a combination into complex compounds, such as carboxyhaemoglobin. Consequently, even an analysis of Fe²⁺ may be simplistic, and like DNA and RNA, we would have to wait for an analysis of compounds such as carboxyhaemoglobin.

Ferric Fe³⁺ iron may be relevant in oxidative processes and rusting, but not for life compounds, so we would expect far less of a contribution to TRUE unit analyses. Clearly here, Ferrous Fe²⁺ reflects the same score as Fe⁰ in these tables, as above. Because elemental iron is tabulated based on the valence of Fe²⁺.

---

[1] DNA= Deoxyribonucleic acid. RNA= Ribonucleic acid. The abbreviations might be better known than their long-hand names.

[2]  Abundance statistics for iron are markedly source dependent so this comment depends on what is measured: The percent abundance of iron in the universe is 0.11%, in the sun 0.1%, in meteorites is a remarkable 22%, in the earth’s crust is 6.3%, in oceans is only 3 millionths of a percent and in humans is low but exceedingly important at 0.006%.