A TRANSCENDENTAL PHYSICS UPDATE AND SUMMARY

A TRANSCENDENTAL PHYSICS UPDATE AND SUMMARY

Since initiating this blog in 2012, I have now entered 108 posts, including a number of videos, published papers, explanations and comments related to the inclusion of consciousness in the equations of theoretical physics, which I call Transcendental Physics, and the collaborative work with Dr. Vernon Neppe, MD, PhD, on the Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm, a shift moving science beyond the current standard model, which is a materialistic, reductionist, incomplete picture of reality.

The number of visits to this website is now approaching 50,000 and there were 129 visits yesterday. With over 100 entries posted, people new to the site are asking questions like: Which post or posts will give me a quick overview? Does your theory really resolve the Holy Grail of theoretical Physics by including relativity and quantum physics under one consistent, workable theory? If so, How? What are TRUE units? And how do they differ from Planck units?

The purpose of this post is to provide easy access to a basic understanding of this material and answers to these questions

We live in a quantized physical world. A world composed of whole numbers of a basic unit. How do we know that? Planck discovered that energy occurs only in multiples of a quantum unit, never a fraction. And Einstein proved that mass is frozen energy. If energy is quantized, then so is mass, because E = mc².

In physics, Planck units are physical units of measurement defined exclusively in terms of universal physical constants that take on the numerical value of 1 when expressed in terms of these units. Planck units are very useful in theoretical physics because they elegantly simplify the mathematical statements of physical law by replacing the arbitrary units of inches and feet, centimeters and meters, pounds and grams, miles and kilometers, etc. TRUE units are Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence. While Planck units normalize space, time, mass and energy in the equations of physics, they fail to normalize all quantitative parameters occurring in the equations of science.  The problem is not a short coming of Planck units, but a short coming of the mathematics being used. The calculus of Newton and Leibniz is based on continuity and infinitesimal that can approach infinitely close to zero. This is inappropriate in a quantized reality.

I developed a new calculus, The Calculus of Distinctions to replace Newtonian calculus with a mathematics that includes the action of consciousness. Application of this new calculus to relativity and quantum mechanics required replacing Planck units with TRUE units. TRUE units are derived from the relativistic equivalence of mass, energy, space, time and consciousness at the quantum level. TRUE units replace the infinitesimals of Newtonian calculus.

To gain a basic understanding of this, without learning a whole new system of mathematical logic, scroll down to the post “True Quantum Units, 3 Dimensions of Time and the Big Bang Myth” posted May 5, 2015 (my son Joshua’s birthday).

You might also want to review “What are Dimensions?”, “What is Mass?” and “Explaining the Unexplainable” posted April 19, 2015.

These four short videos should give you the basics.

THE TRIADIC QUANTUM STRUCTURE OF REALITY

THE COMBINATION OF TRUE ELEMENTARY QUANTA

If all forms of substance are quantized, then in order for quarks to combine in stable structures, they must satisfy integer equations reflecting the quantization of matter and energy. We call those Diophantine (integer) equations the Conveyance Equations, because they convey the logical structure of reality into the space-time domain of our 3S-1t experience. Compound particle stability depends on the integer solution of the equation representing the combination of two or more particles to form a third particle. This family of Diophantine equations is represented mathematically by the expression

Σⁿ_i=1 (X_n)^m = Z^m. 

When n = 2 and m = 3, the expression becomes the equation

(X₁)³ + (X₂)³ = Z³

If we combine two cubes, two spheres, or any two regular polyhedrons to form a third regular three dimensional object of the same shape, we have 

S(X₁)³ + S(X₂)³ = S(Z)³

^{where S is the shape factor. But S cancels out and we have} 

(X₁)³ + (X₂)³ = Z³

Which Fermat's Last Theorem tells us can have no integer solutions. However, when n = 3 and m = 3, the expression becomes the equation (X₁)³ + (X₂)³ + (X₃)³= Z³, which does have integer solutions. This fact that the Conveyance Equation has no integer solutions when n = 2, but does when n = 3, explains why quarks are always found combined in threes. The combination of two quarks is asymmetric because when n = 2, because of their spin, they are unstable. But when n = 3, they can form stable structures.

Using  (X₁)³ + (X₂)³ + (X₃)³= Z³, we are able to find integer solutions that perfectly represent the combination of three quarks, two up quarks and one down quark to form a proton, and one up quark and two down quarks to form a neutron. Using experimental data we can then determine how many TRUE units of the third form (gimmel- most likely dark matter) are included to form stable atoms.

We choose the Hydrogen atom to start with because it is the simplest, most stable, and most abundant, even though very reactive, known element in the universe, and proceed to apply TRUE analysis to the elements of the Periodic Table.

When this is done, we find that all of the life-supporting elements and compounds are stable with the same high percentage of TRUE units of gimmel. This means that life is no accident, because no particle coming out of a big bang explosion could be stable without the proper amount of gimmel. Without symmetric stability, no physical universe could form.

Note: the details of the derivation of the stable forms of the elementary particles, atoms of the periodic table, and life supporting molecules are presented in a paper currently being peer reviewed for publication.

EINSTEIN

SCROLL DOWN TO POSTS ABOUT EINSTEIN'S LAST DREAM

FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM FLT65 PART SIX

FERMAT' LAST THEOREM FLT65 PART SIX

FLT65 provides a straight-forward proof using the Division Algorithm and its corollaries to show that for n equal to p, any prime greater than 2, there are no purely integer solutions for Yⁿ = Zⁿ - Xⁿ. Briefly, it does this as follows:

·       The right-hand side of the equation Y^p = Z^p – X^p can be factored into two polynomials:

                       Z^p – X^p = (Z – X)(Z^p-1+XZ^p-2+…+X^p-1)                                                  (1.)

·       These factors can be considered to be co-prime (not containing common factors) for reasons that are detailed in FLT65 and Appendix C.

·       Since f(Z) and g(Z) are co-prime and their product is equal to Y^p, a perfect p power integer, both factors must be equal to perfect p-powers of co-prime integers if all three variables, X, Y and Z, are to be integers.

·       The proof continues by dividing the p - 1 degree polynomial, designated by f(Z), by another first degree polynomial, Z – a, where a is defined by f(Z) = (Z – a)^p: 

f(Z)/(Z – a) = q(Z) + r(Z)/(Z – a)                                                      (2.)

and for X and Z equal to specific integers, a becomes the variable: f(Z)/(Z – a) = q(a) + r(a)/(Z – a),  Note that for every specific value of Z, there is an a,  but for only one specific integer value of Z, when q(a) is maximum and r(a) is minimum, are they unique.

·       The division algorithm and its corollaries apply to all algebraic polynomials in real number variables, including the algebraic polynomial factor of the FLT equation, f(Z) = Z^p-1+XZ^p-2+…+X^p-1.

·       And since integer solutions of Y^p = Z^p – X^p, if any exist, form a subset of the real number solutions of the equation, integer polynomials formed with them must also conform to the Division Algorithm and its corollaries.                                                              

·       By corollary II of the division algorithm, the polynomial remainder when f(Z) is divided by Z – a is f(a), and by Corollary III of the Division Algorithm, if q(a) and f(a) are unique, the remainder must equal zero if f(Z) is divisible by Z - a.                            

·       But, when f(Z) is divided by Z – a, the remainder, r(a) =f(a) = a^p-1+Xa^p-2+…+X^p-1 cannot equal zero because if X and a are equal to integers, f(a) is always positive.

·       For only one specific pair of integer values of a and Z, the quotient and remainder, q(a) and r(a), are unique, and corollary III says that, if the quotient and remainder are unique, a polynomial f(Z) is divisible by Z – a, IF, AND ONLY IF, f(A) = 0; so the fact that f(a) ≠ 0 implies that the polynomial factors, f(Z) and Z – a, are co-prime for those specific integer values of a and Z. This is an unavoidable contradiction since for an integer solution of the Fermat equation, Z – a must divide f(Z) because f(Z) = (Z – a)^p, a perfect p-power of an integer.                

·       Thus, if a, X and Z are integers, f(a) ≠ 0 proves FLT.                                       

IS THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER (LHC) A THREAT TO OUR PLANET?

IS THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER (LHC) A THREAT TO OUR PLANET?

I’ve written about the LHC in several of my posts on this Transcendental Physics blog, and you can find my comments in a number of posts by looking for LHC, Large Hadron Collider, Collider, Cyclotron, etc. in the post labels. Information is also to be found in work I’ve done with Dr. Vernon Neppe in publications available on www.BrainVoyage.com.

While I am critical of the hype put out by particle physicists claiming that they are creating conditions the big bang theorists hypothesize for the beginning of the universe, our research into the history of the universe has been made easier by the data the LHC and other particle colliders have generated. Statements about 'creating conditions prevailing in the early universe' and the importance of detecting the Higgs Boson are greatly exaggerated in order to get funding. Of course, some particle physicists may even believe this hype. Particle physicists appear to be making the logical error of thinking that they can fully understand a complex object by blowing it apart and looking at the pieces. In fact, the whole is always more than the sum of the prats. This is especially true in regard to quantum physics.

Concerning effects of the LHC on the environment, fortunately, the effects of the operation of the collider on the planet are not as serious or far-reaching as you might think, - at least not yet – for the following reasons: 

1.) Contrary to popular hype, the LHC does NOT create the conditions existing at the beginning of the universe, whatever the big bang theory projects that to be. The extreme conditions of high-energy particle-collision velocity and temperature the LHC creates exist only in very minute volumes relative to the size of an atom, -let alone the size of the planet- and they exist only for nano-secconds. 2.) In contrast with the early atom smashers, and atomic bomb tests, the LHC has a lot of very sophisticated shielding and protection built in to protect the technicians working there and people living in the area surrounding the LHC near Gneva Switzerland.

Particle physicists, through little fault of their own, have tunnel vision (pun intended). Once we get away from the simplistic reductionist idea that we can learn all there is to know about sub-atomic reality by studying the pieces flying away from a particle collision, and combine the microcosmic with the macrocosm of the observable universe, we begin to see a more cohesive picture: Unknown to particle physicists, we (Neppe & Close) have proved conclusively that there could be no physical universe without the influence of the third form of reality, the part of reality that is not directly measurable as mass or energy. This is absolutely and irrefutably proved by application of mathematical and hyper-geometric dimensional logic to quantum mechanical experimental results and LHC particle collision data. Furthermore, there is strong evidence that the third form of reality is related to dark matter/dark energy. Not only that, the only available candidate that can be identified as the third form of reality is consciousness.

It is also now very clear that the third form of reality is a manifestation of a primary form of consciousness that has necessarily existed from the beginning, and even before any beginning we can identify by inductive and deductive reasoning from the current state of the physical universe. 

I propose that this Primary Consciousness is none other than that which the Spiritual Masters of all times have called God, the Infinite Intelligence underlying reality and connecting the individualized consciousness of every living being.

HOW WE REALIZED EINSTEIN'S LAST DREAM

FINISHING EINSTEIN’S DREAM

THE BRIDGE BETWEEN QUANTUM AND QUASAR

Dr. Don Lincoln, a senior scientist at the U.S. Department of Energy's Fermilab, the U.S.' largest Large Hadron Collider research institution, in an article entitled ‘Einstein’s Unfinished Dream’ said yesterday:

“Einstein's heyday coincided with the birth of quantum mechanics, and the stories of his debates with physicist Niels Bohr over the theory's counterintuitive and probabilistic predictions are legendary."God does not play dice with the universe," he is famously reported to have said. …Einstein was well aware of the need to understand the quantum realm. And, in his quest to understand and explain general relativity, he sought to understand how gravity performed in his epic theory when it was applied to the world of the supersmall. The result can be summarized in three words: It failed badly.

Einstein spent the rest of his life, without success, pursuing ways to integrate his theory of general relativity with quantum mechanics. While it is tempting to describe the history of this attempt, the effort is of interest primarily to historians. After all, he didn't succeed, nor did anyone in the decades that followed.”

Our friend Albert is dancing in Spirit right now, because we have succeeded: we have built that bridge between the macroscale and the microscale phenomena of our universe!

HOW DID WE DO IT?

After about six years of intensive research and collaboration, we discovered that using the ultimately smallest quantum unit, which we call the Triadic Rotational Unit of Equivalence (TRUE), a third form of the substance of reality was found to be necessary for any stable sub-atomic structure to exist. 

When the elementary particles of physical reality: electrons, photons, quarks, protons and neutrons were analyzed using TRUE units, suddenly, all of the patterns of atomic structure and the natural elements of the Periodic Table were clearly explained! 

The most amazing thing that we discovered was the fact that the most stable TRUE unit structures were the elements and molecules of life, and no stable structures could form without the proper mix of mass, energy and gimmel! Intelligent life is no accident. It was built in from the beginning. 

The necessary mix of mass, energy and gimmel was, and is, determined by the mathematical, hyper-geometrical structure of space, time and consciousness. This structure is described by a set of equations we call the Conveyance Equations. The forms of these equations conveying the logical structure of higher dimensions into the physical universe include the Pythagorean theorem, Fermat's famous Last Theorem, and the forms that govern the combination of quarks in threes and the resulting forms of all of the atoms from Hydrogen on, and all the stable forms of the universe.

EINSTEIN'S DREAM REALIZED AT LAST!

EINSTEIN’S DREAM

THE BRIDGE BETWEEN QUANTUM AND QUASAR

Albert Einstein’s dream of uniting relativity and quantum physics in one consistent paradigm has at last been realized! The Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP), developed by Drs. Ed Close and Vernon Neppe has done the trick! With a new scientific approach, called the Calculus of Distinctions, a system of logical procedures uniting mathematics and geometry, a system designed for use in the quantized world, they have for the first time ever, made relativity and quantum physics work together. The uniting factor is the third form of the substance of the universe, that is neither matter nor energy, but yet necessary for the stability of the physical reality. Close and Neppe have dubbed it ‘gimmel’. The discovery of gimmel, made possible by the development of TRUE analysis is discussed in articles below. 

We are making new discoveries almost daily, and the results of on-going research are being published here and elsewhere in books and professional journals. Keep checking for news.