WAYS TO EXPLORE QUANTUM REALITY

 

EXPLORING QUANTUM REALITY

© Copyright 2022, Ed Close

Because the senses of the physical bodies we inhabit on this planet are limited to perceiving only very small fractions of the vast ranges of space, time, mass, energy, and consciousness that actually exist, we are normally unaware of the overwhelming majority of reality because it exists beyond the limited focus of the physical senses developed for the purpose of physical survival on this planet. It is necessary for evolving consciousness to gradually increase awareness over many lifetimes of sentient beings in order for individuals to be able to learn to expand their individualized consciousness toward the eventual grand goal of Cosmic Consciousness.

The limited finite awareness of conscious beings exists roughly in the middle of the range of density and intensity of mass, energy, and gimmel that make up reality, which exists from the finite quantal level to the cosmological whole, expanding toward infinity. The quantum level is more accessible to us, for one simple reason: As quantized consciousness expands in all directions, there is a ‘bottom’ to reality at the quantum level, while expansion in the opposite direction goes on toward infinity forever. The primary building blocks of reality exist at the quantum level and it is for this reason that derivation of a  functional quantum calculus is so important for the continuation of the development of science.

It is clear that Max Planck understood the need for a quantized mathematical approach to the task of understanding reality. He developed a quantized system of measurement, that is now known as Planck units, in an effort to accomplish that. It didn’t evolve into a complete quantum calculus for a number of reasons, but it was a definite move in the right direction. He wrote:

 

“... die Möglichkeit gegeben ist, Einheiten für Länge, Masse, Zeit und Temperatur aufzustellen, welche, unabhängig von speciellen Körpern oder Substanzen, ihre Bedeutung für alle Zeiten und für alle, auch außerirdische und außermenschliche Culturen notwendig behalten, und welche daher als »natürliche Maßeinheiten« bezeichnet werden können.”

Translation: “… the possibility exists to set up units for length, mass, time, and temperature, independent of special bodies or substances, keeping their meaning as necessary, for all times and for everyone, including even extraterrestrial and non-human cultures, and which therefore can become known as ‘natural units of measurement’."

 

Planck tried to create a natural system of units by setting the four universal constants: the speed of light, the gravitational constant, the quantum of action, now known as Planck’s constant, and Boltzmann’s constant, equal to one. The problem was that no quantum calculus consistent with the unitary quantum equivalence he had defined was established. Among the constants he used to establish quantum equivalence, only the speed of light was based on the basic elementary units of length (space) and time. The other constants involve compound non-quantum variables. The result was the production of quantum fractions that have no counterpart in stable physical reality.

Max Planck, much like his friend Albert Einstein, was a physicist first, and a mathematician only as needed to support his work in physics. He may have realized that establishing a consistent quantum calculus would require a complete redefinition of the fundamental operations of arithmetic, algebra, and the calculus of differentiation and integration, a truly daunting task for anyone to undertake!. Also, he may have been aware that there are no known general methods for solving the Diophantine equations that result from describing quantum reality in a mathematically consistent manner. The CoDD, is a quantum calculus developed from 1986 until 2015, with the help of Russian Mathematician Vladimir N. Brandon from 1997 until 2003, and the brilliant polymath, Dr. Vernon M. Neppe, from 2008 until 2015. The CoDD with truly natural units, fills the basic need for a quantum calculus appropriate to investigate the quantum reality underlying the world we experience.

The results of the application of the CoDD with 3-D quantum equivalence units to the mathematical expression for constant light speed, as discussed in the last post, reverses the illusion, caused by the limitations of our physical senses, that space/time and mass/energy are fixed. But, in a universe with no fixed universally prefered reference frame, wherein each measurement interacts with every other measurable variable at some level, focusing on one part of reality to understand it completely is like playing a game of “whack-a-mole”, or pulling on a thread in an endless mosaic: The act of measurement in one spot evokes an equal and opposite reaction somewhere else. The ultimate resolution of this dilemma is for the observer to become one with the whole of reality. That state of consciousness is what I have chosen to call Cosmic Consciousness.

However, while reality cannot be encompassed by expansion into the cosmos unless we achieve the ultimate goal of Cosmic Consciousness, because there is a “bottom” to reality at the quantum level, the subtle essence of reality can be cornered there, so to speak, at least momentarily, by gradually expanding individualized consciousness to include awareness of the building blocks of reality. This can be done consciously by developing the siddhis discussed in earlier posts, or it can be done mathematically by applying the quantum calculus (CoDD) to analyze the combination of two up quarks and one down quark to form the most stable object in all of physical reality, the proton. This application of TRUE analysis, done nearly a decade ago, resulted in the discovery of the existence of gimmel, the all-important non-physical component of the proton.

The physics and mathematics proving the existence of gimmel have been peer-reviewed and published in several places and referenced multiple times in previous posts. For the complete proof see: Close, ER & JA: Secrets of the Sacred Cube, A Cosmic Love Story, Outskirts Press, 2019, ISBN 978-1-9772-1024-1, pages 35 – 62; Neppe VM, Close ER: Reality begins with consciousness: a paradigm shift that works (5th Edition) Fifth Edition. Seattle WA, Brainvoyage.com, 2014; and my chapter in the AAPS Volume I, first edition entitled Is Consciousness Primary? Edited by Drs G.E. Schwartz and M.H. Woollacott (2019).

In my opinion, once the basic laws governing the physics of rotating objects spinning at near light speed are understood, the mathematics proving the existence of gimmel, the non-physical component of the proton, are not beyond that which a bright student of algebra at the high school or first-year college level can easily understand. However, I have promised to avoid mathematical notation and jargon as much as I possibly can in these posts, so I will do my best now to explain the analysis that resulted in the proof of the existence of the measurable non-physical component of reality in terms that I believe anyone can understand.

Eleven members of the family of 12 elementary objects known as quarks are all very unstable when not locked into combinations to form the hadron building blocks of physical reality and the elements of the periodic table. But when two of the smallest quarks, the most stable of the family, called up quarks, and one of the next larger quarks, the down quark, combine, they form the most stable known object in the universe, the proton. Application of the quantum calculus I call the Calculus of Dimensional distinctions (CoDD), with Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence (TRUE) analysis, to this combination reveals that the proton cannot possibly be stable without the existence of specific numbers of additional Triadic Rotational Units of Equivalence (TRUE) of something that cannot be either mass or energy.

The CoDD TRUE analysis provides the mathematical and physical explanation of the fact that stable subatomic objects and consequently the elements of the periodic table are formed exclusively by the combination of three elementary objects, not two, four, or any other number. Because the TRUE are defined by the mass and volume of the smallest stable elementary object, the free electron, the redefinition of the fundamental operation of addition in the new quantum calculus, is mathematically analogous to the combination of quarks forming the proton. This leads to a variety of clearer and mathematically simpler explanations of the quantum processes that form all of the stable structures of the physical universe.

Learning about reality is its own reward because knowledge is power, and knowledge of the structure, meaning, and purpose of reality leads to ultimate power over the negative forces of our dualistic existence on this planet. The pathway to this knowledge may be difficult, but, as Jesus said to his disciples:

“The harvest truly is plenteous, but the labourers are few; Pray ye therefore the Lord of the harvest, that he will send forth labourers into his harvest.”

In future posts I plan to discuss how explanations derived from applications of the quantum calculus and spiritual siddhis lead to a deeper understanding of quantum reality that will allow us to learn how to consciously impact reality at the quantum level through positive intent, in ways that will be beneficial to all.

ERC – 5/22/2022

THE PARADIGM SHIFT TO CONSCIOUSNESS

A SUMMARY OF THE PARADIGM SHIFT TO CONSCIOUSNESS

With this post I have now published 212 dissertations on this site. They have been posted over the past 3 years and 8 months in an effort to make the results of the work of a lifetime of almost 80 years available to anyone who is interested. For many years I have believed that mainstream science has tragically wandered into the dead end of materialism, and I have also believed that it can be put back on the track to real discovery and positive progress by recognizing that the physical universe available to our senses is in fact, only a small part of reality. I also expected that when consciousness is properly included in the equations comprising the scientific model of reality, new horizons beyond belief would be opened. That expectation has been slowly realized over the past 30 years. The pace of important findings and discoveries has increased significantly over the last six plus years during which I have worked in collaboration with Dr. Vernon M. Neppe.

In this post, I will attempt to summarize what I consider to be the most important findings in a way that anyone can understand. I believe it is important that I do so, because right now is the time that the truth I have been privileged to help bring to light is more important than ever before. We stand right now at the most critical juncture in human history. We can choose to go beyond the limitations of mechanical animal existence with the development of human consciousness and achieve the real purpose of all existence, or we can become just another failed species. The choice is ours.

Why is this information so critical at this time? Because mainstream science, while wonderfully successful at improving our animal comforts, technical applications, and the ability to destroy ourselves, has failed us miserably by turning its back on the part of reality that is most important to our survival: the spiritual essence of being, of which physical existence is but a miniscule part. It is time for scientists to open their eyes to the vast reality that lies beyond the purely physical.

THE PURPOSE: SPIRITUAL PROGRESS

The most important development of human civilization, and consciousness in general, is real spiritual advancement. Physical and intellectual development can be supportive of spiritual advancement, but they are secondary to genuine spiritual progress which underlies and drives all positive change. Social, political and philosophical development have often run counter to real spiritual advancement because institutional behavior tends to magnify the weaknesses and negative traits of the individual. The larger the institution, even though it may be organized with good intent, the more it magnifies negative tendencies. We will allow things to happen in the name of country, organized religion, or even institutional science that we would never do as individuals.

MATHEMATICS AND CIVILIZATION

What I wish to illuminate here is the backbone of the logic of reality, reflected in certain aspects of the history of mathematics and the corresponding rise and fall of civilization on this planet. It is hidden in three threads running through the conscious minds of mathematicians, natural philosophers and scientists from the end of the last ice age, about 12,000 BC, to the time of the known ancient civilizations: the Sumerians (4000 – 1600 BC), the Minoans (3000 – 1400 BC), and the Ancient Egyptians (4000 -1200 BC), to the Greeks: Thales (624 – 527 BC), Pythagoras (569 – 495 BC), Plato (428 -348 BC), Aristotle (384 – 322 BC), Euclid (330 – 260 BC), Archimedes (287 – 212 BC), Eratosthenes (276 – 194 BC), Hipparchus (190 – 120 BC), Geminus (10 BC – 60 AD), Menelaus (70 – 130), Ptolemy (85 – 165), Diophantus (200 – 284 ), and Theron (335 – 405), to the Arabs and Persians: Al-Khwarizmi (780 – 850), Abu Kamil (850 – 930), Omar Khayyam (1048 – 1131), to the Western Europeans: Fibonacci (1170 – 1250), Levi ben Gerson (1288 – 1344), Nicholas Kryffs (1401 – 1464), Cardan (1501 – 1576), Fermat (1601 – 1665), Leibniz (1646 – 1716), Euler (1707 – 1783), Gauss (1777 – 1855), Georg Cantor (1845 – 1918), Max Planck (1858 – 1947), Hermann Minkowski (1804 – 1909), Albert Einstein (1879 – 1955), Wolfgang Pauli (1900 – 1958), Kurt Gӧdel (1906 -1978), and G. Spencer Brown (1923 -  ). The gap from 1200 BC to 600 BC, between the end of the known ancient civilizations and the development of mathematics by the Greeks was bridged to some extent by Chinese, Hindu and Hebrew mathematics.

The idea that mathematics and civilization have advanced from virtually nothing to the current status during the past 3000 years is a fiction derived from the egoism of Western science, and it is a fiction not supported by fact. It is more likely that the viewpoint of Sri Yukteswar Giri (“The Holy Science”, written in 1894), derived from ancient Vedic texts, is true. Sri Yukteswar concludes that the development of consciousness, and consequently civilization, is cyclic, like everything else. There is ample evidence for this all over the planet. There are many megalithic structures dating from during, and even before the known ancient civilizations that we cannot duplicate today. The construction of many of them, like Gobeki Tepe in Turkey (dated about 10,000 BC), the Aswan obelisk (dated about 1500 BC) and Puma Punku in Peru (dated about 500 AD) required mathematics and engineering techniques unknown to mainstream science today.

MATHEMATICS REFLECTS THE LOGIC OF REALITY

The three threads of mathematics reflecting the logic of reality are the threads of geometry, algebra and number theory. How do these three aspects of mathematics reflect and describe the nature of reality? The images constructed in conscious minds depend upon the ability of conscious entities to recognize distinctions, - first the distinction of self from other, and then the recognition of finite distinctions (objects) within self and other. Distinctions consist of distinct shapes, with specific properties and meanings. Shapes, (geometric forms) are described using variables of extent, like height, width and depth. Distinct shapes may contain variable amounts of mass and energy, which may be described using variables of content. Distinctions existing in reality may also have other properties that impact the consciousness of the observer, or have meaning to the observer, like mechanical or organic motivation, that may be described in variables of impact or intent that are relative to the status of the observing entity.  Mathematics is the logical language describing the distinctions making up the structure and dynamics of reality in terms of the variables of extent, content and impact or intent.

WHAT IS A CALCULUS?

A calculus is a system of logical operations that permit calculation, where calculation is defined as the transformation of distinctions of one form into an equivalent distinction or distinctions of another form or forms. The operations that make up a calculus are the logical processes of the differentiation of variables, combination of shapes and integration of the properties of the distinctions to which the calculus applies. Every calculus has an arithmetic, an algebra and a scope of application. The details of calculi in general and the differential and integral calculus of Newton and Leibniz in particular, known for 300 years as ‘the calculus’ are beyond the scope of this post, but can be found in advanced mathematics texts. But it is relevant here to point out that the arithmetic of a calculus is based on quantitative distinction, enumeration and equivalence, and the operations that define the arithmetic are addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division, which may be commutative and/or associative, depending on the properties of the group of distinctions to which it applies.

FINDING THE APPROPRIATE CALCULUS TO MODEL REALITY

As explained in previous posts, the calculus of Newton and Leibniz is only applicable in the mid-range scale of reality. It yields erroneous results at the extremely large scale of relative velocity and space-time, and it gives inaccurate, and sometimes wildly incorrect results at the extremely small scale of the quantum. The solution at the upper extremes of observation and measurement is not difficult. Accurate calculations and predictions are obtained by applying relativistic corrections. But the solution at the lower extreme is a bit more difficult. It requires a calculus of discrete variables. Some of the elements of such a calculus are already available to us in the works of some of the mathematicians and scientists listed above. They are specifically: Pythagoras, Euclid, Diophantus, Fermat, Planck, Minkowski, Einstein, Gӧdel, Pauli, and Brown. Adapting and expanding Brown’s Laws of Form, applying Gӧdel’s incompleteness Theorem, the multi-dimensional approach of Pauli and Minkowski, Einstein’s relativity, Planck’s quantization, the Pythagorean theorem, Euclid’s axiomatic approach, and Fermat’s Last theorem (see the Posts on putting consciousness into the equations), I derived the Calculus of Distinctions, Dimensional Extrapolation, the Conveyance Equation, and the TRUE quantum unit, as the most basic distinction of quantized reality. This approach completes the re-uniting of geometry, Diophantine algebra and number theory in a logical system capable of modeling reality. The result is the new mathematics of TDVP, the appropriate metaphysical basis for exploring the nature of reality.

SUMMARY OF THE SUMMARY

The Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) has provided a comprehensive model resolving paradoxes, and answering numerous questions that have puzzled mainstream scientists for decades. See lists and details in previous posts. The mathematics of TDVP describes the quantized geology, algebra and numerical nature of reality in terms of a truly quantum unit, the Triadic Rotational Unit of Equivalence derived from Large Hadron Collider data, and the principles of relativity and quantum physics.

Application of TRUE analysis to quarks, electrons, protons and neutrons, and the natural elements of the Periodic Table, has revealed a reality of three spatial dimensions, three time-like dimensions, and three dimensions of consciousness embedded in an infinite substrate of intelligence. It has also revealed the necessity of a third non-material form of the essence of reality that must exist in the universe in order for the dynamically stable structures of the universe to exist. So now we know why the universe is so fine tuned for life. Finite manifestation of Cosmic Consciousness, in the form of gimmel, the third form of the essence of reality, had to exist before the first particle of the physical universe could form, and thus we have the answers to the most basic puzzles of all: Why there is something instead of nothing? Who are we, and what is the meaning of existence and the purpose of life? 

We are sparks of the Infinite, inhabiting finite vehicles in space-time in order to learn how to live and grow into our cosmic potential. 

THE OVERDUE PARADIGM SHIFT AND THE SCIENCE OF THE FUTURE

TDVP, THE SCIENCE OF THE FUTURE

THE CONCEPT OF PARADIGM SHIFT

While a doctoral candidate at Johns Hopkins University, I became aware of the works of physicist, historian and philosopher of science, Thomas S. Kuhn. In his ground-breaking book “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” (University of Chicago Press, 1962 ISBN 0-226-45808-3), Kuhn made the point that, while scientific knowledge progresses incrementally through the study and research of many individual scientists, science also undergoes sudden "paradigm shifts" that open up new ways of  understanding reality that mainstream scientists would never have considered valid before.

Clearly, relativity and quantum mechanics were such shifts. Kuhn also noted that different paradigms are often irreconcilable accounts of the nature of reality. I would add that true paradigm shifts always contain new principles and new mathematics virtually unknown to science prior to the shift. But scientists have vested interest in the principles of the paradigm they have worked on. For this reason, there is always great resistance to the new paradigm in the ranks of mainstream scientists. When Einstein published his special theory of relativity in 1905, for example, mainstream scientists called it “utter nonsense”! Quantum theory was met with the same kind of ridicule when Heisenberg and Bohr introduced the uncertainty principle and the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics in the late 1920s and early 1930s. Even Einstein had a hard time accepting the new quantum paradigm, famously saying “God doesn’t play dice with the universe!”

HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF

We are at a point in the history of science on this planet where the next paradigm shift is overdue. Science has been plodding steadily along, filling in the details of relativity and quantum physics, and applying the new concepts and findings of these paradigm shifts to other fields of scientific study like astronomy, chemistry, biology, geology, medicine, and even consciousness studies. Application of the principles of relativity and quantum mechanics have resulted in advances in every field of science and technology. But there are still problems with, and between relativity and quantum physics.

Many scientists, philosophers, futurists, psychics, and thinkers of every stripe agree that a new paradigm shift is needed, and many have speculated that it will require a radical new theory of space and time. When Dr. Neppe and I began publishing the results of applying a nine-dimensional vortical spin model, we found no less than 24 competing ‘theories of everything’, many claiming to be the basis of the next paradigm shift, and it is not unusual for a discovery within the existing scientific paradigm to be incorrectly called a breakthrough, or even a paradigm shift. Finding phenomena predicted by the ‘standard model’ like the Higgs boson and gravity waves, e.g., mark progress within the existing paradigm, but conflicts and unexplained phenomena still exist, indicating the need for a real paradigm shift.

WHAT MAKES A THEORY A REAL PARADIGM SHIFT?

If you have been reading the posts on this blog, or have read the books and scientific papers published by Dr. Vernon Neppe and this author over the past five years, you have been getting an introduction to the first real paradigm shift since relativity and quantum physics. The new mathematical and scientific concepts introduced here comprise the foundation of the science of the future. How can I make such a bold statement? I can, simply because it is true. In this post, I will provide proof of this statement for you. This proof will consist of showing that TDVP has all the hallmarks of a paradigm shift. Real paradigm shifts always contain the following:

1.    New concepts that integrate all the valid concepts of the previous paradigms

2.    New mathematics that extend the valid aspects of the previous paradigms

3.    Explanations of observed phenomena unexplained by previous paradigms

4.    Predictions of phenomena not predicted by the previous paradigms

PROOF THAT TDVP IS A REAL PARADIGM SHIFT

The Triadic Dimensional Vortical Paradigm (TDVP) has grown out of ideas developed independently by Drs. Vernon M. Neppe and Edward R. Close over many years, and in collaboration over the past six years. Let’s look at how and why TDVP is the science of the future.

1. NEW CONCEPTS

The new concepts, neither recognized nor allowed in the old paradigm, that made relativity and quantum mechanics not just strange new theories, but real paradigm shifts were:

·       Relativity: Observation and measurement of space, time and mass are not absolute for physical objects and observers; they vary with relative motion, and space-time is a mathematically integrated four-dimensional continuum.

·      Quantum mechanics: quanta have no specific particle or wave form until they are observed and measured; there is a finite, inescapable uncertainty in every measurement; and the observer is part of the experiment.

·       TDVP: Consciousness is included as a third type of dimensional domain, in addition to, or as extension of the dimensional domains of space and time; and there is a third quantum form of the substance of reality called gimmel.

Notice that just as the new concepts of relativity and quantum mechanics were both extensions of, and additions to Newtonian physics, the new concepts of TDVP are extensions of the concepts of dimensionality and quanta, and additions to the substance of physical reality as a third form.

2. NEW MATHEMATICS

New mathematics does not mean just new equations; it means new mathematical procedures and new axioms that relate directly to the concepts that distinguish the new paradigm from the old paradigm.

·       Relativity: Minkowski four-dimensional hyper-space, and mathematical relativistic inertial reference-frame translations

·       Quantum Mechanics: Schrӧdinger’s formulation of physical wave equations as probability distribution functions, and the expression of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle as a mathematical inequality

·       TDVP: The Calculus of Distinctions describing the organizational function of consciousness in physical phenomena, Dimensional Extrapolation describing the mathematical and geometric nature of unitary projections across dimensional domains, and Diophantine combination equations describing the conveyance of logical structure across Dimensional domains

3. EXPLANATIONS OF UNEXPLAINED PHENOMENA

·       Relativity: Classical physics could not explain the orbit of the planet Mercury, the orbit of the electron in the Hydrogen atom, and other phenomena that were explained by relativistic dimensional contraction and time dilation with relative motion. 

·       Quantum Mechanics: Classical physics could not explain why electrons do not radiate their energy away very quickly and fall into the nucleus of the atom, black body radiation and other puzzling phenomena.  Quantum physics explains these phenomena as results of the quantization of energy and mass, and consequently of space and time.

·       TDVP: Neither Newtonian nor modern physics (relativity and quantum physics) can explain why fermions have an intrinsic ½ spin while bosons do not, the mixing angle of quarks (also known as the Cabibbo angle), why quarks combine in threes, the existence and nature of dark matter and dark energy, and more. TDVP explains the spin of elementary particles and the Cabibbo angle in terms of multi-dimensional domains, explains why quarks combine in threes, and what dark matter and dark energy are, and other phenomena in terms of the third form of the substance of reality.

4. PREDICTIONS

·       Relativity predicted exactly the curvature of light passing near the sun due to the relativistic effects of mass; the dilation of time with velocity and proximity to large masses; the existence of black holes, gravity waves, and a number of relativistic effects that have been verified empirically. 

·       Quantum Mechanics predicted that events perceived to have happened in the past can be affected by choices made in the present or future. This was proved by delayed-choice experiments independently in Germany and the US. Quantum physics predicted the existence of the positron and other particles that have since been detected. The Higgs boson is the most recent example.

·       TDVP predicted that the intrinsic spin of elementary particles is due to the rotation of those particles in multiple dimensions. This was verified for fermions, first with a thought experiment and then with a physical simulation. TDVP also predicted the percentage of dark matter and dark energy and the percentage of regular matter and energy in the universe. These percentages were verified by the Hubble probe. The calculus of distinctions predicted the existence of a third form of reality in the form of the non-quantum receptor in 1996. The existence of the third form was verified by the discovery of gimmel in 2011.

ON-GOING EXPLANATION, DISCOVERY AND PREDICTION

As we began to apply the new mathematics of the calculus of distinctions to known phenomena and generally accepted theories in the patchwork of theories making up the current scientific paradigm, we were rewarded almost daily with new insights and discoveries.

One key discovery was the discovery that the principles of relativity and quantum theory applied to particle physics at the level of quarks leads to a truly minimum quantum mass-energy equivalence unit, replacing the Planck unit. We gave it the appropriate name: ‘True Rotational Unit of Equivalence’ (TRUE). When we applied TRUE analysis to basic atomic structure, we discovered that TRUE units of a third form of substance, with no directly measureable mass or energy, were required for stable atomic structure. We called that mass-less, energy-less substance gimmel. Gimmel turned out to be the link between inertial mass, energy and consciousness. It conveys logical structure to physical reality through the agency of a set of Diophantine (integer) equations we call the conveyance equations. The conveyance equations for the sub-atomic particles electrons, protons and neutrons are unequivocally derivable from LHC particle data and known pure number theory theorems.

The discovery of gimmel led to one surprising discovery after another. Perhaps the most important discovery was that application of TRUE analysis to Hydrogen and to Deuterium, the building block of all the stable elements most important to organic life: Carbon, Oxygen, Nitrogen, etc., led to the discovery that the current big-bang expanding-universe theory of the origin of the universe is flawed. Deuterium, the building block of the elements of life, is not created in the interior processes of the stars. This means that essentially the same amount of deuterium and stable elements existing now had to be there at the very beginning of any origin event! Not only that, no particle coming out of a big-bang explosion could be stable, or combine with other random particles to form stable atoms without the presence of gimmel.

In other words, logical patterns and hierarchical order were built into the universe from the beginning: The symmetrically stable elements necessary for the development of organic life were present at the first instant of any origin event, whatever it might have been.

PREDICTIONS FOR TDVP, THE SCIENCE OF THE FUTURE

The following discussion is somewhat speculative, but it is based on the new knowledge of the nature of the universe that is emerging from the inclusion of consciousness in the equations of physics and the discovery of gimmel, the third form of the essential ‘stuff’ of the universe.

As we applied TRUE analysis to all of the elements of the Periodic Table, new patterns and deeper information linking all the electron shells, nuclear and sub-nuclear structure to the physical properties of the elements came to light. In addition, we found that obvious gaps in the symmetric patterns of the Periodic Table are filled with triadic combinations that are important organic molecules in the structures of RNA and DNA.

Because gimmel carries the qualities of consciousness, including logic, purpose and meaning into physical reality, we predict that all the sciences will be infused with new life, meaning and purpose with the inclusion of consciousness as a real force shaping the nature of reality.

The new mathematics of the calculus of distinctions with the logical procedures of dimensional extrapolation projecting from a single quantum of space, time and consciousness, to three sets of three dimensions, revealing the logical structure of the conveyance of meaning and purpose into the physical universe, will open the door to the legitimate and mathematically rigorous study of the phenomena of consciousness interacting with the physical universe. Consciousness and its impact on reality will at last be included in the equations of science, ushering in a far greater understanding of what the universe really is, who and what we are, and the meaning and purpose of our existence.

PUTTING CONSCIOUSNESS INTO THE EQUATIONS PART 19

(Also see MANIFESTO OF TRIADIC REALITY below.)

QUANTIZED REALITY APPLYING CLOSE’S CALCULUS OF DISTINCTIONS VERSUS THE CALCULUS OF NEWTON (PART 19)

 

Our unified reality

Prior to this research, the conventional view had been that the quantal reality was very different from the macroscopic reality. In this and related work, we have shown we have one reality as the microcosm does not fundamentally differ from the macrocosm. In general, there is no mathematical or dimensionometric difference between the ‘microcosm’ of elementary particles and the macrocosms of molecules, human beings, planets, solar systems, and galaxies. Every structure in the universe, including the entire universe itself, is a quantum structure obeying the same laws of space, time and consciousness

Our quantized reality: The Calculus of Distinctions versus Newtonian Calculus.

Applying the process of rotation and unitary projection from dimension to dimension in Euclidean space, we find that the mathematical structure of basic number theory requires the existence of nine finite orthogonal dimensions embedded successively in an infinitely continuous substrate.

We utilize the logic of the Calculus of Dimensional Distinctions ¹⁰, an application and extension of George Spencer Brown’s Laws of Form ⁵³. In this paper, we demonstrate that LHC particle-collider mass/energy data for electrons, protons and neutrons, can be considered as spinning “distinctions of content”. These occupy unitary “distinctions of extent”.

In the 3S-1t dimensional domain of our physical observations, we find that the light-speed limitation of Einstein’s special relativity and Planck’s quantization of mass and energy define a minimal unitary quantized distinction. ^{55; 83; 88; 89; 113; 114} This minimal mass/energy, space-time distinction is the smallest possible finite building block of the 3S-1t universe. As such, the Calculus of Dimensional Distinctions ¹⁰ replaces the infinitesimal of the differential calculus of Newton and Leibniz ¹⁰ in the mathematical analysis of physical reality. The Calculus of Dimensional Distinctions provides us with the tool needed to extend the work of Minkowski, Einstein, Kaluza, Klein, Pauli, and others such as Rauscher ¹¹⁵, who have attempted to use multi-dimensional analysis to integrate and explain the laws of physics. ^{13; 115; 116}

The process of rotation and unitary orthogonal projection from one dimension to the next in Euclidean space utilizes an extension of the Pythagorean Theorem. Generalization of the Pythagorean Theorem equation to three dimensions and application to the minimal quantized distinctions of extent and content produces a set of Diophantine expressions that perfectly describe the combination of elementary particles.

Integer solutions of these equations represent stable, symmetric combinations of elementary particles. But when there are no integer solutions, the expressions are inequalities representing unstable combinations that decay quickly.

Fermat’s Last Theorem and why three not two particles are required

Fermat’s Last Theorem ^15-17 applied to the Diophantine equation describing the combination of two elementary particles tells us that there are no integer solutions, and thus no stable combinations. The equation for the combination of three particles, on the other hand, does have integer solutions. This explains why three quarks, not two, combine to form protons and neutrons. This explains why we need a third substance, which by definition is mass-less and energy-less, and which we call gimmel and, we postulate, involves a significant amount of “consciousness”, because there is no other legitimate option.

Revisiting Diophantine Triplets: Fermat’s Last Theorem or the Conveyance Equation?

Perusal of our Tables pertaining to TRUE units and gimmel, may lead to a question about Diophantine triplets. When examining these tables from right to left, we see that mass-energy scores have been unified, and then there are gimmel scores. This totals to TRUE units scores and volumetric equivalents. But there are only two variables on the right side of the equation not three. How does this resolve three sets of Diophantine cubes? The answer is that the cube analysis is done analyzing downwards the sum of the cubes of the three variables, electrons, protons and neutrons.

The protons and neutrons, of course, are subdivided into the two up-quarks and one down-quark of each proton, and the one up-quark and two down-quarks in each individual neutron of the specific element, radical, molecule and compound. Therefore, the calculations for protons and neutrons are, as indicated, based on triads of three quarks each. However, we still apply only one electron in these analyses.  

NEXT: FURTHER IMPLICATIONS