**PARADOX, PATTERNS AND REALITY **

**Reality Awaits Discovery**

**©
Copyright 2022, Ed Close**

__Dreaming
the Unreal __

As mentioned in the last post,** the idea that there might
be a way for conscious beings to “re-imagine” and change reality in whatever
way we might want to, has become increasingly popular, and the history of
science and technology attests to the fact that we do actually affect real
changes in processes that start with imagination because some things that
surfaced in human imagination as science fiction 50 to 100 years ago, have
actually manifested and radically changed our lives. Not only that, **certain
advanced experimental and theoretical developments suggest that some aspect of
consciousness may interact directly with physical reality in some way, at the
quantum level.

It is obvious that conscious beings interact with
reality all the time at the macro level, in ways that effectively change some
of the natural features of reality for specific purposes through the organization
and preparation of materials, followed by appropriate construction activities.
Examples include everything from insect and animal nests to skyscrapers,
computers, and rocket launchers. But the dream is that we may be able to affect
reality in a more direct way by making changes at the quantum level. But before
we can do that consciously and safely, with any hope of producing positive
results, we need to have a far better understanding of exactly how
consciousness relates to physical reality at the quantum level.

A very formidable barrier we have to overcome before
we can think about how to affect changes at the quantum level without wreaking
havoc, is the huge difference in size between what we perceive with our
physical senses and the scale of elementary quantum objects. Prof. Jon
Butterworth’s attempt to help us grasp the true magnitude of this unimaginable size
difference was quoted in the New Approach Part 24 blog, under the heading *Taking
a Deeper Look*, posted on May 1, 2022. Underlining his point, I’d just like
to say that the difference is far greater than the difference between the size
of a grain of sand and the size of the Earth or sun; it’s more like the
difference between a grain of sand and the size of the milky Way, or the volume
of the largest spiral galaxy in the physical universe.

This relative size barrier, while ostensibly
overwhelming, is not insurmountable because of an innate skill that will
eventually be available to us all. It’s a yogic siddhi (a spiritual sense
perception in this case) enabling a conscious being to magnify anything to a
size that is as large as is needed. In a couple of books and previous posts I
have described how I first experienced this innate ability spontaneously while
sitting in a classroom when I was eleven years old.

For the purposes of this discussion, I’m asking you
to imagine, or to suspend your belief system momentarily if you can’t imagine it
and accept that I am describing a real experience. In the study mentioned
earlier, in which we determined the correlation between the Annie Bessant meditation
viewing of atomic structure and results of TRUE analysis of atomic structure
using the TDVP CoDD, we see experimental and mathematical evidence of the
existence of the siddhi that allows us to magnify quantum details. This is essentially
what I did to develop the CoDD, and that resulted in the discovery of gimmel,
the non-physical organizing feature of reality.

Developing a quantum calculus (the CoDD) based on a
quantum unit (the TRUE), defined as the mass and volume of the smallest elementary
object, the electron, and applying it to analyze the most stable quantum-level
process, the combination of two
up-quarks and one down-quark to form the proton, also revealed concepts in the
current Standard Model that have no existence in reality. The most obvious are
dimensionless and massless particles, one-dimensional objects, and
two-dimensional objects. No such things exist in reality. They are purely
conceptual. How do we know this?

Zero-, one-, and two– dimensional domains do not
exist in a quantized reality because, as Einstein pointed out, space has no
existence of its own, and Zero-, one-, and two– dimensional domains have no
capacity to contain anything, not even one quantum of mass or energy. From a
purely logical point of view, a mathematical singularity, a line, or an area,
have no content, no mass, and no energy. They only exist as mental concepts. No
real object can have less than one TRUE of mass, energy, or consciousness
content. The inclusion of mathematic singularities, lines, and areas with no
depth in reality models leads to contradiction, confusion, and logical paradox.

__Paradox and Dimensional
Patterns __

Paradox, like pain and suffering, is God’s gift to
those who take thinking about human existence seriously. Without paradox, there
is no real progress: No real progress in Love, science, artistic creativity, intellectual
understanding, or spiritual evolution. Real paradox means contradiction,
conflict, and confusion – but also, most importantly, paradox presents profound
opportunities for consciousness expansion and spiritual growth. Therefore, paradox
should be welcomed as an invitation into a more comprehensive reality with
opportunities for scientific and spiritual progress.

Paradoxes revealed when conventional mathematical descriptions
of physical combinations are translated into the quantum calculus of the CoDD lead
to the discovery of higher dimensionality and revelation of many more
meaningful patterns of reality. The simplest example is the “imaginary” number
of conventional mathematical calculation. The square-root of negative one is a
paradox in 3-D space, but in 4-D spacetime, it is not paradoxical. In fact, the
square root of negative one is the proper value of the unitary projection from the
3-D domain into the 4-D domain. An important invariant feature of hyper-dimensional
domains is the transmutation of the basic unit of measurement into a more
complex root of unity after each triad of dimensions. This becomes obvious in applications
of the primary quantum calculus (CoDD), while it remains hidden in conventional
mathematics because the units of observation and measurement are not related directly
to quantum reality.

With the basic unit of measurement, the TRUE,
defined by the mass and volume of the electron, patterns reflecting the physical
features of quantum reality appear in the integer multiples and Diophantine
equations of the CoDD model that are hidden in the conventional physical and mathematical
analyses of the Standard Model by inappropriate applications of the infinitesimal
calculus of Newton and Leibniz and by idealized concepts like dimensionless
particles, and one- and two-dimensional structures that do not actually exist
in quantized physical reality. Here are some examples of patterns revealed by
the CoDD, with measurements in triadic rotational units of equivalence (TRUE):

The electron: 1^{2} = 1^{3}, a perfectly
symmetrical 3-D rotating stable object.

The up quark: 2^{2} = 4, consisting of 4 three-dimensional
unitary objects rotating around each other is not a perfectly symmetrical 3-D
object, but the up quark is the simplest and most stable quark, and it is symmetric
in three planes, making it almost as stable as the proton.

The down quark: 3^{2} = 9, consisting of 9
three-dimensional objects rotating in one plane; not a perfectly symmetrical
3-D object, it decays in a little under 15 minutes when not in combination with
up quarks to form a proton.

The proton: (2x3x4)^{3} = (24)^{3} =1728,
a perfectly symmetrical 3-D rotating object.

The Hydrogen Atom:
(1^{1}x2^{2}x3^{3})^{3 }= 1^{3}x2^{6}x3^{9
}= (108)^{3} = 1,259,712, two symmetrical objects, an electron,
and a proton, rotating around each other in three dimensions.

People known as numerologists have been fascinated with
numerical patterns in mathematics for centuries, but most of the patterns they note
are not directly related to the structure of reality because the conventional units
of measurement are not quantum units. They are related to the fundamental operations
of mathematics and the use of the number base 10. Change the number base or the
operational rules of calculation, and most of the patterns noticed in
conventional math by numerologists disappear or change.

The important point here is not just that there are
interesting numerical patterns in CoDD quantitative descriptions of elementary
objects, but that these patterns tell us something about the actual dimensional
structure of the quantized elementary objects that make up physical reality,
and how they combine to form more complex objects. The numerical patterns in
the quantum units (TRUE) describing the three elementary objects (the electron,
up quark, and down quark) and two combinations (the proton and the hydrogen
atom) described above, tell us the following:

1)
The primary features that make quantum physical
objects stable are simplicity, symmetry, and spin, creating maximum angular
momentum.

2)
The total number of TRUE is equal to a
cube in the most stable objects, the electron, and the proton, indicating
perfect dimensional symmetry.

3)
Objects with total TRUE equal to a square
(like down quarks) are symmetric in one plane only, with limited stability when
they are not in combination with other partially symmetric objects.

4)
Elementary objects do not combine like macro-objects,
they merge in a manner similar to volumes of fluid at the quantum level.

In future posts I will describe the nature of
quantum reality revealed by TRUE analysis in more detail and explain how this knowledge
will help us to be able to affect
positive changes in reality at the quantum level.

ERC – 5/14/2022

## No comments:

## Post a Comment