As pointed out in the last post, if we are to understand the
true nature of reality,
we must examine the roots of human perception and understanding. Based on the
input from the senses, a tiny fraction of the spectra of energies vibrating and
radiating throughout the universe, our brains process energies in the form of
photons and electrons to form images. We take these images to be more or less accurate
representations of reality. Our brains automatically compare new images coming
from the reality we perceive to exist ‘out there’ with internally stored images
that constitute our memories of previously received energetic information. In
this way we learn and form an understanding of reality. But while that
understanding may allow us to function and survive for a time, we must realize
that it is indirect, limited, incomplete, and may be inaccurate due to the
limitations of our physical senses and the deterioration and distortion of
memories over time.

Each
of us lives in a world of our own consciousness, and our success as individual
organisms depends in a very real way upon the extent to which our individual
conceptual worlds correspond with reality. Caught up in the world of our own
consciousness, we mistakenly believe that our conceptualized model of reality

*is*reality, and this causes us much confusion, suffering and pain. To the extent that our internal models, i.e. our belief systems, whether religious, philosophical, political, or scientific, are at odds with reality, we suffer. When this confusion of conceptual models with reality becomes institutionalized, the suffering is global.
The original good intent of the institutions of religion, philosophy and
science was to minimize the discrepancies between our conceptualized models of
reality and reality itself, and avoid error and the resultant suffering by
combining the efforts of the best minds to attack the problem of understanding
the nature of reality. This honorable intent, however, has all too often become
infected by ego, greed and personal or group ambition, resulting in political subversion,
suppression of truth, subjugation of millions of people, and massive suffering.
It seems to me that it should be obvious that the more accurate our model of
reality is, the more completely it reflects reality, the more harmonious,
meaningful and purposeful the future of humanity becomes.

We
have established in earlier posts that reality is the ultimate logical system,
and per GÓ§del’s theorems, that reality is infinite, in the sense that it is
open-ended. In order for our conceptual model to accurately reflect reality, it
must reflect that which exists, and only that which exists, and it must be
infinite in the sense that it is open-ended. It may seem obvious that reality
is, by definition, that which exists, and that it is ever expanding into
infinity, but it is precisely the lack of, or negligence of this clear
definition of existence and infinity that causes so many problems with the
current scientific paradigm and the standard model, resulting in paradoxes,
conflicts and unsolved puzzles.

In pure mathematics and symbolic logic, existence has long
been held to be axiomatic, so that an object is assumed to exist if it has
definable properties. With that definition, the question of actual existence is
then of little or no importance in relation to the application of mathematical
and logical operations such as calculation, inference or deduction. This is
problematic in that it imputes existence to conceptual constructs such as dimension-less
points, mass-less particles, quantum-state matrices, Eigenvector spaces, and ‘mixing
angles’ of elementary particles that do not actually exist as objects in
sub-atomic reality. This is analogous to assigning the same level of reality to
the written description of a dog as to an actual living dog.

On the basis of the limited information we have through the
physical senses, memory and operation of the brain, it seems reasonable to
conclude that reality is doubly infinite; i.e., that space and time are
infinitely extended and infinitely divisible. With the discoveries of Planck
and Einstein, however, we now know that these notions are incorrect. They are
illusions born of the limitations of our physical senses and our partial
knowledge of the nature of reality. For example, there is a quantum limit to
divisibility. Matter and energy exist only in multiples of a finite smallest
possible unit. This means that Newton’s calculus, while wonderfully accurate in
the mid-scale of reality, is not applicable at the quantum scale because it is
based on the assumption of infinite divisibility.

You might object that while mass and energy are quantized as
Planck discovered, there seems to be no reason to believe that space and time are
not infinitely divisible. That, however, is not the case. Einstein’s discovery
of the absolute limit on relative velocity in 4-D space-time, means that space
and time do not exist without mass and energy (See the Einstein quote in the February 6, 2016 post, ILLUSIONS),
and because velocity is measured in length units and time units, space-time is
also quantized.

The lower limits of mass and energy, and the upper limits of
space and time, discovered by Planck and Einstein, come together in the
analysis of the atom where quantum particles spin with near light-speed angular
velocities, to produce the true quantum unit of equivalence, which I call the TRUE
unit, and this led to the discovery of the third form of the essence of reality,
which we call gimmel. This third form, neither
mass nor energy, completes the symmetry of hydrogen and other atoms. Without it
there could be no physical universe as we know it. So the existence of the
physical universe supportive of life and consciousness depends on a
non-physical form of reality.

Back to the concepts of existence and infinity: To construct
a mathematical model that is an appropriate logical system reflecting the
reality revealed by the discoveries of relativity, quantum physics and TRUE
unit analyses, we must re-formulate the axioms of Euclid, replacing the
dimensionless point with the minimum existing TRUE unit of our quantum reality,
and the infinitesimals and infinities of Newton with TRUE units and transfinite
dimensional domains. When we do this, the equations describing the model are
all Diophantine (integer-solution equations), reflecting the quantum nature of
reality. The TRUE unit (Triadic Rotational Unit of Equivalence) is the smallest, most basic unit of mass/energy/consciousness volumetric equivalence.

This re-formulation of the mathematical description of reality
re-aligns dimensional domains and geometry with number theory: The first three dimensional
domains (spatial domains) are fully describable using integers, the second
three dimensional domains (time domains) are fully describable with integers plus
imaginary numbers, the third three dimensional domains (finite consciousness domains)
are describable with integers, imaginary numbers and complex numbers, and content
within these dimensional domains is definable in TRUE units of mass, energy and
consciousness.

Dimensional domains with more than nine orthogonal dimensions add
one additional type of hyper-complex number derived from the roots of unity for
each additional dimension. Dimensional domains with more than five dimensions
(three of space, one of time and one of consciousness) are considered
transfinite because they are not directly accessible with the finite physical
senses. All dimensional domains definable in multi-dimensional reality are
embedded in an infinite conscious substrate.

Content within the three- four- and five-dimensional domains
is measurable in TRUE units of mass, energy and consciousness. Transfinite
content may be manifested in the 3S-1t domain as mass, energy or gimmel, and gimmel
is meted out in the elements of the Periodic Table according to the Conveyance
Equation, a multi-dimensional Diophantine equation derived from the
re-formulated geometric axioms, the Pythagorean Theorem and Fermat’s Last
Theorem. These derivations are beyond the scope of these posts, but have been
published in technical papers, and the book “Reality Begins with Consciousness”
by Neppe and Close. www.BrainVoyage.com. Application of the mathematical logic system the
Calculus of Distinctions, also beyond the scope of this post, replaces the
application of the differential and integral calculus of Newton and Leibniz at
the quantum level, avoiding the errors and confusion arising from using a
mathematical tool based on assumptions inconsistent with a quantized and
relativistic reality.

"The original good intent of the institutions of religion, philosophy and science was to minimize the discrepancies between our conceptualized models of reality and reality itself, and avoid error and the resultant suffering by combining the efforts of the best minds to attack the problem of understanding the nature of reality. This honorable intent, however, has all too often become infected by ego, greed and personal or group ambition, resulting in political subversion, suppression of truth, subjugation of millions of people, and massive suffering. It seems to me that it should be obvious that the more accurate our model of reality is, the more completely it reflects reality, the more harmonious, meaningful and purposeful the future of humanity becomes."

ReplyDeleteOnly too true, Ed, if read in conjunction with all that has been declared on this site, going right back to Ancient Egypt and long before, if deliberately suppressed and non-recorded history were to be taken into account. A massive misrepresentation on the very nature of our human, Earthly, existence has long since been perpetrated. and it now really is a question of human survival in or elimination from the eternal universal domain - Whatever its fundamental mathematical essence transpires to be! So, for this lifetime, I feel I must be satisfied with the implications of my mystically-inspired, science-of-the-whole formula, 'Y=X squared plus One', and leave it to greater minds to determine the fundamental and mathematical nature of the 'One' - That's if we find out the nature of its fourth ingredient that will save and cosmicate us!

As Ed further states his 'gimel' mathematical model really is beyond the scope of this ' what are we all about in the universe' article and so I would just like to add in conclusion: We are work in progress from Ultimate Force spiritual to Ultimate Being temporal/spiritual, ad infinitum, a calculus, whether of 'distinctions' or otherwise - The Cosmos Rules! Amun!

Thank you Brian. I'm happy to see that the blog finally allowed you to comment here.

ReplyDeleteAnd, thank you, Ed, for being, IMMIO, the ‘mathematical genius extraordinaire’, who has helped no end to further my mystically-inspired and unshakable belief in the above-stated conclusion. May the Ultimate Force be with us!

ReplyDeleteThought you had the problem identified until 2/3rds way through your article when you fell off the cliff with the assumption that consciousness is more that a participant in reality, but also a source. A great idea tainted by centric(s), as in helio, ethno, etc. as if reality required consciousness. Same old question, if a tree falls in the forest ...? Almost there by identifying the problem, thanks. Infinity is an illusion.

ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment. We will probably agree to disagree on some things; but maybe I didn't clarify in this post that there are many aspects of consciousness, not just the finite individualized kinds. And they are all connected by a field or substrate, if you like. Infinity is only an illusion if you confine your thinking to a finite box. Once you experience infinity, you realize that the apparent existence of separate finite distinctions is the illusion.

Delete