PUTTING CONSCIOUSNESS INTO THE EQUATIONS PART 13

HYDROGEN AND THE ELEMENTS OF THE PERIODIC TABLE: APPLYING GIMMEL (PART 13)

The Hydrogen atom is unique among the natural elements in that it has only two mass/energy components, the electron and proton. Thus, because Fermat’s Last Theorem prohibits the symmetrical combination of two symmetrical particles; they cannot combine to form stable structures like the combination of quarks to form the proton and neutron. The electron, with a small fraction of the mass of the proton, is drawn by electric charge to whirl around the proton, seeking stability. This means that the Hydrogen atom, the elemental building block of the universe, composed only of the mass and energy of an electron and a proton, is inherently unstable. So why is it that we have any stable structures at all; why is there a universe? As Leibniz queried: “why is there something rather than nothing”?

One of the X_n integers must be 24 to represent the TRUE unit value of the proton, and one must be 38 to represent the TRUE unit value of the neutron. Among the integer solutions of the m = n = 3 conveyance equation listed above there are no primitive solutions with 24 and 38 as solution integers. But we can multiply the primitive solution 12³ + 19³ + 53³ = 54³ by 2 to get 24³ + 38³ + 106³ = 108³. Since there are no smaller integer solutions with 24 and 38 as terms in the left side of the equation, we can try the solution that provided a stable Helium atom: 24³ + 38³ + 106³ = 108³.

Since the Proton required 17 mass/energy units and 7 ג units, adding up to 24 Total TRUE units, to achieve triadic stability (see Tables describing the Proton), to achieve the same level of stability as the proton and neutron, the Hydrogen atom must have a third component. This satisfies the conveyance equation and produces a stable Hydrogen atom with a total volume of 108³.

Using these calculations to represent the Hydrogen atom, we have:

Table 13A-H1 TRUE-Unit Analysis for Hydrogen 1 (Protium), Valence = 1*

Particle	Charge	Mass/Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
e	- 3	1	105	106	1,191,016
P+	+ 3	17	7	24	13,824
ד	0	0	38	38	54,872
Totals	0	18	150	168	1,259,712=1083

By definition, the valence and the number of valence electrons is the same number for Hydrogen.

At this point, we are uncertain if this is the same third substance we have called gimmel, or could it be a fourth substance which we might call daled that is substituting for the TRUE units of the electron. We therefore provisionally call it Daled, the fourth letter of the Hebrew alphabet knowing that daled might turn out to be synonymous with gimmel ג . Differentiation at this point might be academic whether gimmel or daled are, in effect, the same, but it is critical to have this dichotomy at present. We could postulate that the Daled is just simply Gimmel ג again and write it in our tables as C ג   (“C-gimmel”) consisting of 38 units of that third form of the ‘stuff’ of reality. This way we recognize it is not measurable as mass or energy. The substitute for the lack of neutrons in Hydrogen-1 (Protium) is then in the form of gimmel or daled. This way, the fact that Hydrogen is stable and ubiquitous in the universe is explained and Hydrogen goes from an unstable compound to the compound with the most gimmel/daled of all the elements. For convenience, we’re just labeling this  ג.

However, this gives the Hydrogen atom far the most gimmel /daled. If that third and fourth (or further third) substance has substantial consciousness, this chemical hydrogen should be the major component in our cosmos in regard to something as opposed to nothing. And, as we know, Hydrogen is by far the most abundant and by far the most reactive element in the cosmos¹⁰¹.

Yet, without the ג units needed by Hydrogen to achieve stability, the universe as we experience it could not exist. The TRUE units of the two symmetrically stable entities found in the Hydrogen atom, the electron and proton, could not combine to form a third symmetrically stable entity (Fermat’s Last Theorem). Because they could not combine symmetrically, they would spiral and be easily separated by any external force. Even if they could adhere to other particles, the resulting universe would be very boring. All multiples of such a building block would have the same chemical characteristics. With the input of the appropriate number of ג units, however, Hydrogen exists as a basic building block of symmetrically stable forms in the 3S–1t observable domain of the physical universe we experience.

In 3S-1t, TRUE units can manifest as mass, energy or ג, in order to form symmetrically stable particles and the 168 total TRUE units of the Hydrogen 1 atom may be arranged in another stable structural form, observed as the simple combination of one electron, one proton and one neutron, known as Deuterium, an isotope of Hydrogen (an atom with the same chemical properties).

Hydrogen 2 (H2) (also called Heavy Hydrogen) is held together by electrical charge and 128 ג units, 22 less than the H1 atom. This means that H2 is not as stable as H1. But it still means that satisfying the conveyance equation we should be dealing with a somewhat stable element even if it is an isotope.

TABLE 13A- H2 TRUE-Unit Analysis for Hydrogen 2 (Deuterium), Valence = 1^*

Particle	Charge	Mass/Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
e	-3	1	105	106	1,191,016
P+	+3	17	7	24	13,824
N0	0	22	16	38	54,872
Totals	0	40	128	168	(108)3

What about other isotopes of H1? Is it possible that the TRUE units of a Hydrogen atom or a Deuterium atom can combine with one or more additional neutrons to form stable isotopes? Hydrogen 3 (H3), known as Tritium, is a second isotope of Hydrogen. Its form in TRUE units is represented below.

We see that H3 is an asymmetric structure. One electron, one proton and two neutrons, brought together by attractive forces, cannot combine volumetrically to form a symmetrically stable structure, and as a result, it is unstable and there are very few H3 atoms.

TABLE 13A- H3 TRUE-Unit Analysis for Hydrogen 3 (Tritium), Valence = -1 + 2 = 1

Particle	Charge	Mass/Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
e	- 3	1	105	106	1,191,016
P+	+ 3	17	7	24	13,824
2N0	0	44	32	76	438,976
Totals	0	62	144	206	(118. 018…)3 *

Looking at the TRUE unit structure for H1, H2 and H3, we see that all three are bonded by electrical charge, but H1 has volumetric stability and 150 ג units holding it together; H2 has volumetric stability, more mass/energy units and fewer ג units than H1; and H3 has more mass/energy units and ג units, but no volumetric stability.

This explains why H1 is the most abundant, H2 less abundant, and H3 correspondingly less stable. The atomic weights of the elements of the periodic table, in “amu” (atomic mass units), are actually the mean values of atomic masses calculated from a great number of samples. The accepted mean atomic weight for Hydrogen to four significant figures is 1.008. This includes H1 and all isotopes of Hydrogen. If all hydrogen atoms were H1 atoms, this number would be exactly 1. H1 is by far the most stable, and therefore, most abundant, of the Hydrogen family, making up more than 99. 99% of all Hydrogen in the universe. ¹¹² Other H isotopes make up the remaining 0.01%, mostly H2, with H3 and other isotopes heavier than H2 occurring only rarely in trace amounts. 

QUESTION #2: WHAT IS THE SOMETHING OF REALITY?

WHAT IS THE SOMETHING OF REALITY MADE OF?

In contemporary science, everything, at least everything in the vicinity of planet Earth, is believed to be made of something measurable as mass and/or energy in the form of combinations of the atoms of the elements of the Periodic Table. These atoms are physical structures made up of combinations of three things: electrons, protons and neutrons, with photons being emitted from the structures under certain circumstances. The protons and neutrons are made up of triads of up-quarks and down-quarks that are almost never, if ever, seen alone. These ‘elementary’ particles all have an intrinsic characteristic spin of ½, and are called fermions. Other members of the ‘particle zoo’ with whole-number spin, called bosons, are short-lived products of atomic and sub-atomic collisions and reactions, and/or exist within atoms and nuclei as gluons. To preserve parity, that is to keep physical reality balanced, all of these particles have anti-particles. Oh yes, and because of the immense rotational and translational energy of these particles, they are surrounded by electromagnetic and gravitational fields. Finally, in keeping with de Broglie and Einstein’s work, all particles have vibratory or rotational frequencies.

This theoretical picture, called the Standard Model, is reasonably successful and complete. There are, however, a few things that the standard model of particle physics does not explain, and, there are some conflicts with relativity.   Some of the things unexplained by the standard model are: particle mixing angles, like the Cabibbo angle, named after the Italian physicist who discovered it, why fermions have an intrinsic spin number of ½, the role of symmetry, broken symmetry and super symmetry, and why particles spin at all. This last one will be the subject of the next post.

The Close-Neppe TDVP nine-dimensional spin model answers these questions, and unites relativity and quantum physics by putting consciousness into the equations. The logic of TDVP incorporates some new math called the calculus of distinctions, dimensional extrapolation, and Diophantine conveyance equations. This should not be surprising, because paradigm shifts have always required new math. Relativity required the new math of Minkowski’s 4-D space-time, and quantum mechanics required Schrӧdinger’s wave equation and Heisenberg’s probability matrix and Uncertainty Principle. The calculus of distinctions, which I developed and extended from George Spencer Brown’s Laws of Form in 1989, may be difficult to learn, but it is no more difficult than the rotational group theory of Grassman algebra, Lie algebra, and other complex algebras used in attempts to explain spin in the current paradigm.

The calculus of distinctions is the replacement of the calculus of Newton and Leibniz, made necessary by the discovery that the universe is quantized. Dimensional extrapolation and the conveyance equations are also necessary to deal with a quantized reality. The calculus of Newton and Leibniz was sufficient when we thought physical reality was infinitely continuous, and is still very useful for macro-scale calculations. At the quantum level, however, it is inappropriate and leads to some of the weirdness and misunderstandings[EC1]  in the current paradigm.

So physical reality is made up of spinning, quantized bits of something, - but spinning quantized bits of what? It’s not spinning bits of matter, because the more we’ve looked at atoms, nuclei, electrons and quarks, the less solid and matter-like it has become. The smallest possible spinning something turns out to be a nine-dimensional energy vortex. How do we know it is the smallest possible bit? Because Einstein’s relativity tells us that as a spinning bit gets smaller and smaller, its spin (angular momentum), volume and mass approach a limit dictated by the limit on spin velocity: the speed of light. Where these limits converge the TRUE unit is defined.

Speaking of relativity, Einstein’s famous equation E= mc² can tell us a lot, and it doesn’t take complicated mathematics. Anyone can understand it. Einstein’s equation applies to any finite system, from the smallest bit of something, to the entire physical universe at any given point in time. So consider the smallest possible physical system: a system consisting of just one unit of energy and one unit of mass. If one unit of energy is equivalent to (equals) one unit of mass times the speed of light squared, then by the simplest mathematical logic, the speed of light is equal to the square root of one unit of energy divided by one unit of mass. But speed is defined as distance travelled divided by the length of time required for something to travel that distance (miles per hour, for example). So if mass and energy are quantized (as proved by Max Planck) and the smallest possible volume of space is the space occupied by the spinning bit of something, we can define the smallest meaningful distance as the circumference of the spinning bit, and the smallest meaningful amount of time as the time it takes for the bit of spinning something to complete one rotation. Setting each of these quantities of mass, energy, space and time equal to one, we have the Triadic Rotational Unit of Equivalence defined.

Now, because the speed of light, as Einstein’s equation says, is equal to the ratio of energy to mass, we see that in any finite system of mass and energy, like the Earth, or the solar system, or the Milky Way Galaxy, the speed of light is determined by the ratio of energy to mass. If mass is converted to energy (as in an explosion) the ratio of E to m becomes larger and the speed of light increases, and if energy is converted to mass (as in a system that is cooling down) the ratio of E to m becomes smaller, and the speed of light decreases.  This tells us that, if a finite, localized part of the universe is losing energy, the speed of light has to get slower than in the rest of the universe, and if an isolated part gains energy, the speed of light will be faster. However, in any stable finite system, at any point in space-time, the speed of light is constant and nothing can accelerate past it (Einstein’s first Principle of Relativity).

Finally, the spinning bits of something that make up the observable and measurable physical universe, from the combinations of three quarks that make up the three elementary particles of atoms, which make up the molecules, compounds and cells, of animals, vegetables and minerals, everything occurs in triads, and the most basic of these spinning bits of something, the quarks, are also triadic. In order to be stable long enough to support life, they must be composed of three ostensibly different forms of the something: mass, energy and a third form which we are calling Gimmel. That third form of the something is neither mass, energy nor Gimmel, but the organizing factor that pervades the universe and conveys logical structure, meaning and purpose to the physical universe, the virtual tip of the iceberg of reality. That’s what the spinning bits of something are made of, and without it, there would be no physical universe, or meaning or purpose.

With the discovery of TRUE units of Gimmel, leading to the discovery of the source of mass, energy and Gimmel, i.e., the source of all things, the pervasive, unnamed something, finally, an understanding of the substance, meaning and purpose of the universe can be restored to our collective consciousness. This is vitally important and crucial at this moment in the unfolding of space, time and human consciousness, if we are to move away from the brink of destruction, and enter a new era of security, peace and abundance on this planet, a tiny ball of rock, water and mud, supporting life, intelligence and consciousness in a minor rotational arm of an otherwise un-noteworthy galaxy, spinning in space, time, floating in the un-manifest void of Primary Consciousness.

---

 [EC1]

STABILITY AND ABUNDANCE

TRUE UNIT ANALYSIS

Using TRUE-unit analysis, we can investigate every possible combination of H1 atoms and neutrons and determine which combinations are the most stable. After Tritium, the next stable combination of TRUE units, Helium, involves 336 TRUE units, as shown below.

HELIUM Valence = - 2 + 2 = 0 (Inert)

Particle	Charge	Mass/Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
2e	- 6	2	210	212*	9,528,128
2P+	+ 6	34	14	48	110,592
2N0	0	44	32	76	438,976
Totals	0	80	256	336	(2x108)3

Why is this not called “quadrium”, a third isotope of Hydrogen? It is a new element because it has two electrons filling its outer (and only) shell, so that it is not attracted to other atoms.

New elements arise when a unique new combination of TRUE units, constructed using multiples of the basic building blocks of electrons, protons and neutrons is formed. The next element is the combination of the inert atom, Helium, with the asymmetric atom, H3 with to form Lithium.

LITHIUM, Valence = – 2 + 3 = +1

Particle	Charge	Mass/Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
3e	- 9	3	315	318	32,157,432
3P+	+ 9	51	21	72	373,248
4N0	0	88	64	152	3,511,808
Totals	0	142	400	542	(330.32…)3 *

^* Since the total volume is not an integer cubed, Lithium, like Tritium, is volumetrically asymmetric. It has a stronger electrical bond than H3 and more ג units connecting it with the multi-dimensional substrate for added stability, but it is less stable because it is asymmetric.

THE TERTIARY LEVEL OF SYMMETRIC STABILITY – MOLECULAR BONDING

We’ve seen how quarks combine in very stable symmetric triads of TRUE units and how atoms form stable or semi-stable vortices, spinning structures consisting of stable triads of protons, neutrons and electrons. A third level of stable and semi-stable structures occurs as molecules are formed from more complex combinations of elemental atoms.

The Role of Valence

The number of electrons in the outer shell of an atom determines the observable identifying chemical characteristics of an element and with which other elements it can combine. Due to the quantized attractive force of electrical charges, arising from quantized angular momentum and spin, electrons are attracted to the oppositely charged protons in the nucleus of an atom. Electrons, having a fraction (1/17) of the mass of photons, are pulled into orbit around the protons of an atom, forming specific finite, graduated concentric dimensional domains called “shells” enclosing the atom.

Using TRUE unit analysis, we find that, as a consequence of the size of the atom and the electron in TRUE units, the first shell has a volume of 212 TRUE units, the exact volume of two electrons. The second shell, with a larger diameter, has a volume of 848 TRUE units, and thus can contain 848/106 = 8 electrons. The maximum number of electrons that each shell can accommodate can be found by determining the volumetric equivalence of each shell in TRUE units. The maximum number of electrons in shells 1 through 6, respectively, is 2, 8, 18, 32, 50, and 72. As more complex atomic structures are formed by the addition of more of the building blocks, the finite volumes of the electron shells are filled with electrons, one after the other.

Atoms combine to form stable or semi-stable molecules in mathematically predictable ways, depending on the number of electrons in their outer-most shells. If an atom, even though electrically neutral and symmetrically stable, has room for one or more electrons in its outer shell, it can combine with another atom with that number of electrons in its outer shell to form a new structure. For example, an H1 Hydrogen atom, which has one electron in its two-electron-capacity shell, can combine with Lithium, which has its first shell filled, and one electron in its second shell. In another example of electron bonding, two Hydrogen atoms, with a combined two electron deficiency in the outer shells, can bond with one Oxygen atom which has two electrons in its outer shell. The first compound, Lithium Hydride, is never found in nature, while the second, H₂O, is the most abundant compound in nature. Why?

We are now in a position to explain things with TRUE unit analysis that are not fully understood or well explained by the standard model. For example, why are some elements and compounds more abundant in nature than others? Why is the simple valence-bonded compound Lithium Hydride never found in nature, while Hydrogen Oxide (water), an only slightly more complex compound, is very abundant in nature?

Lithium Hydride is very unstable and reactive with other substances. The current paradigm tries to explain compound bonding in terms of outer shell electrons, largely ignoring the rest of the atom. With TRUE-unit analysis, we see that when bonding occurs, some compounds are able to form symmetric structures, while others are not. The reasons for this involve the total TRUE units of the whole structure, including the other electron shells and the nucleus, not just the outer electron shell. To illustrate this point, we can compare the TRUE unit analyses for LiH and H₂O:

Lithium Hydride, Valence 4 - 2 = +2

Atoms	Particles	Charge	Mass/Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
Li + H2	4e	-12	4	420	424	76,225,024
	4P+	+12	68	28	96	884,736
	4N0+ Cג	0	88	102	190	6,859,000
Totals	0	0	160	512	672	83,968,760=(437.89…)3

H₂O, Water, Valence =  -2 -8 + 10 = 0

Atoms	Particles	Mass/Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
2(H2)+O*	10e	10	1050	1060	1,191,016,000
	10P+	170	70	240	13,824,000
	8N0+2Cג	176	204	380	54,872,000
	Totals	356	1,324	1,680	1,259,712,000=(1,080)3 =(10x108)3

^* See detailed TRUE units analysis for Oxygen listed in order below.

Comparing the TRUE analysis for LiH with H₂O, we can readily see why H₂O is more stable, and consequently more abundant in nature. LiH is strongly electrically bonded, but symmetrically unstable with a valence of +2, while H₂O is even more strongly bonded electrically, volumetrically stable, and has a stable outer electron shell. H₂O also has 790 more units of ג connecting it more firmly with the multi-dimensional substrate.

In Dr. David Stewart’s brilliant work integrating science and spirituality, “The Chemistry of Essential Oils Made Simple, God’s Love Manifest in Molecules” ^ref, he notes that “Theoretically, the next simplest possible atom [after Hydrogen] would be two electrons orbiting around two protons …This would be Helium. …However, [this] is not how helium usually occurs in nature … For some unknown reason, nature does not like Helium without neutrons.”

TRUE unit analysis explains why nature does not produce Helium without neutrons. TRUE unit analysis reveals that sub-atomic particles combine to form new complex structures in several ways: They can be drawn together by the forces of gravity and magnetism, they can become attached, held together by equal and opposite electric charge, they can share valence electrons, and if they have the exact mix of TRUE units of mass/energy and ג that satisfies the conveyance equation, they will form a stable, dimensionally symmetric structure. On the other hand, if the mix of TRUE units cannot satisfy the conveyance equation, bonding will produce asymmetric forms which will be semi-stable, or if their outer shells are not full, even unstable, subject to breaking apart when impacted by external forces, while forms volumetrically symmetric, electrically neutral and without valence electrons will be very stable. Helium without Neutrons, i.e. 2e + 2P⁺, cannot form a symmetrically stable structure. See the TRUE analysis table below.

Helium without Neutrons:

Particle	Charge	Mass/Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
2e	- 9	2	210	212	9,528,128
2P+	+ 9	34	14	48	110,592
Totals	0	36	224	260	(212.917…)3 *

^*While this combination is charge neutral, it is asymmetric, and therefore only semi-stable, easily broken apart.

But why doesn’t a Helium atom achieve stability with more ג units as H1 did?

Helium without Neutrons, with Volumetric Symmetric Stability from ג units:

Particle	Charge	Mass/Energy	ג	Total TRUE Units	Volume
2e	- 6	2	210	212*	9,528,128
2P+	+ 6	34	14	48	110,592
2Cג	0	0	76	76	438,976
Totals	0	36	300	336	(2x108)3

To understand why this doesn’t happen, we have to look at all of the factors that contribute to the stability of an atom. The three major factors, in the three observable dimensions of 3S-1t, are electrical charge, angular momentum and symmetry. These factors depend on the quantized nature of mass, energy and ג, relative motion, and distance from the center of the atom. The overall stability of an atom depends on the combined effect of these factors on all three levels of the atom: the quark, nuclear, and electron shell levels. The effects of these factors are variably described in the current paradigm with terms like polarity, broken symmetry, quantum states, Eigen vectors, and parity.

The Helium atom has electron-shell stability because the first and only shell is full, while the Hydrogen atom does not, allowing it to compensate with ג units of the third form of Reality. As shown below, Helium with neutrons, 2e + 2P⁺ + 2N⁰ is volumetrically symmetric and electron-shell stable, and is, therefore, the form of Helium most often found in nature. Valence is an expression of the atom’s relative electron-shell stability. An atom with no valence atoms is very stable.

NEXT: It's no accident!