**THERE IS NOW SCIENTIFIC PROOF THAT A FORM OF**

**PRIMARY CONSCIOUSNESS**

**IS PERVASIVE THROUGHOUT SPACE AND TIME**

In
the last post, I shared the finding that given that

*something exists*, then application of the logic of the Calculus of Distinctions indicates that*there is no such thing as nothing*. In other words, I contend that I’ve proved that Planck’s discovery that the substance of the universe is quantized means that if even one quantum of anything actually exists, a state of nothingness cannot exist anywhere*or any time*in the quantized universe.
Now
I can imagine a doubter saying: “You cannot prove a negative, and your
conclusion that there is no state of nothingness is negative, so you can’t have
proved it. There must be something wrong with your logic, Dr. Close!” I think the common belief that you can’t prove
a negative may come from the fact that negative statements are often very difficult
to prove or disprove, and from confusing the fact that many negative statements
that seem reasonable, are often false, with the idea that you cannot prove a
negative. Consider the following example:
“We had been studying crows or many years, and all of them were black. We had
never seen a white crow, so we concluded that there are no white crows. Today a
white crow showed up and the negative statement we thought to be true is
obviously false.”

So is
it a fact that you can’t prove a negative? No, for two reasons: 1. because if the
statement that you can’t prove a negative is true, then it is self-contradictory
because it is itself a negative statement, and therefore can’t be proved. Furthermore,
it can be proved that the statement that you cannot prove a negative is false
as follows: Like in the example of the crows, if I can produce even one proof of a negative
statement, the belief that you can’t prove a negative is proved wrong, and I
can produce several. Any mathematician, if he’s worth his salt, has produced
several. For example, I have proved, as have other mathematicians, the negative
statement that there are no integer solutions for the equation X

^{3}+ Y^{3}= Z^{3}. It can’t be proved by trial and error of course, because there are an infinite number of triplet integers X,Y,Z that could be tried.
Now many
ordinary folks who are true believers and even some professional theologians
have used the false argument that you can’t prove a negative to combat the
atheistic claim that there is no God. True believers do not like the fact that the
argument that a negative can’t be proved is false. But just because you can prove that there are negatives that can be proved, doesn’t mean that a given negative like “There is
no God” can be proved. So, while you lose the argument that you can’t prove a
negative, the common argument that a number of atheists have posted on the
internet and written in popular books, that there is no God because there is no
scientific evidence that there is a God” Is also very faulty logic. Just
because self-proclaimed atheists haven’t seen a scientific proof of the
existence of God doesn’t mean there isn’t one. It is the height of arrogance to
believe that just because you can’t prove that God exists, no one can. Not only
that, we now have TRUE unit analysis which proves what no atheist wants to
hear:

**There would definitely be**

*no physical universe*without the involvement of some primary ubiquitous form of consciousness from the beginning of reality as we know it, wherever and whenever that beginning might be.
See
the details in the references placed in the last post and other previous posts.

When it comes down to it, Ed, who really has to prove or disprove anything to others. In a cosmicated sense, it's what we believe in ourselves that really matters to the Ultimate Force, our Higher Self, which cannot be fooled - We're all our own judge, jury and hopefully not our own executioners! Amun!

ReplyDelete